% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Blommaert:202242,
author = {Blommaert, M. and Dekeyser, W. and Baelmans, M. and Gauger,
N. R. and Reiter, D.},
title = {{A} {P}ractical and in {P}arts {A}djoint {B}ased {G}radient
{C}omputation {M}ethodology for {E}fficient {O}ptimal
{M}agnetic {D}ivertor {D}esign in {N}uclear {F}usion
{R}eactors},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-04531},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Divertor particle and power exhaust system design is still
a key issue to be resolved to evolve from experimental
fusion reactors to commercial power plants. In particular
the excessive heat load to the divertor geometry structure
needs to be tackled. The divertor design process is assisted
by computationally extremely demanding codes simulating the
complex physics of the plasma edge. In order to reduce
design costs, advanced adjoint based automated design
methods from aerodynamics have recently been adapted for use
in divertor shape design. A similar methodology is sought to
enable these adjoint based methods for magnetic
configuration design. However, adjoint sensitivities of the
plasma edge grid generator are difficult to obtain, as those
grids are aligned with the magnetic field to overcome
numerical noise arising from the strongly anisotropic plasma
flow. First of all, this results in computational grid
boundaries that change with varying magnetic fields. A
second difficulty is the necessity to use a curvilinear
coordinate system attached to the magnetic field that is
implied by the grid generator.A Practical and in Parts
Adjoint Based Gradient Computation Methodology for Efficient
Optimal Magnetic Divertor Design in Nuclear Fusion
ReactorsIn this paper, these difficulties are overcome by
using a combined finite differences/continuous adjoint
gradient computation. An adjoint plasma edge simulation is
used to overcome the high computational cost of the plasma
edge simulations during gradient calculations. At the same
time, the computationally less demanding yet more difficult
grid generator adjoint sensitivities are avoided by making
use of a finite difference approach to differentiate the
remaining terms within a Lagrangian multiplier approach.
Moreover, an extensive analytical derivation of the partial
derivatives of the plasma edge equations with respect to the
geometrical parameters is avoided by using the finite
difference approach through the forward plasma edge solver
as well. Specific attention is hereby needed for the
implementation of the boundary conditions.},
month = {Jun},
date = {2015-06-03},
organization = {2nd Frontiers of Computational
Physics, Zurich (Switzerland), 3 Jun
2015 - 5 Jun 2015},
cin = {IEK-4},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-4-20101013},
pnm = {174 - Plasma-Wall-Interaction (POF3-174) / HITEC -
Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and
Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-174 / G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202242},
}