% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Bhat:202298,
author = {Bhat, Kaustubh and Tietz, Frank and Guillon, Olivier and
Guin, Marie},
title = {{H}igh ionic conductivity in the system
{N}a3+x{S}c2({S}i{O}4)x({PO}4)3-x},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-04569},
year = {2015},
abstract = {The abundance of sodium and the similarities between
lithium and sodium intercalation processes make it an
attractive alternative as a charge carrier in alkali
ion-batteries. Therefore, interest in high sodium
ion-conductive materials is increasing, especially in the
widely studied class of NASICON solid electrolytes [1]. A
literature survey concluded that the partial substitution of
phosphorus with silicon in the NASICON materials of general
formula
Na1+2w+x-y+zM(II)wM(III)xM(V)yM(IV)2-w-x-y(SiO4)z(PO4)3-z
enhances the ionic conductivity [2].The aim of this work is
to elucidate the impact of introducing silicon ions in the
highly conductive material Na3Sc2(PO4)3 [3]
(sigmaNa=3.8*10-5 S∙cm-1 at 30 °C) and to obtain an even
better ionic conductor suitable as electrolyte in a solid
state sodium battery. Various compositions of the solid
solution Na3+xSc2(SiO4)x(PO4)3-x with 0.1≤x≤0.8 were
synthesized by solid state reaction and crystallographic
data were gathered, correlated with results of ionic
conductivity measurements and compared simulation models. As
a result, one of the 10 best ion-conductive NASICON
materials to date was obtained for x=0.4 (sigmaNa=8.3*10-4
S∙cm-1 at 30 °C). Furthermore, the ionic conductivity
data were correlated with the structural bottleneck along
the conduction pathway of the sodium ions and agrees well
with the conductivity-structure-relationship established for
the series Na1+x+yZr2-xScx(SiO4)y(PO4)3-y [2,4]. Besides,
different ionic pathways of the sodium ions in the structure
were studied with density functional theory (DFT) [5] and
the nudged elastic band (NEB) method [6] and the resulting
activation energies were compared with the experimental
values. [1] H.Y.P. Hong, Mat. Res. Bull. 11 (1976)
173-182[2] M. Guin, F. Tietz, J.Power Sources 273 (2015)
1056-1064.[3] J.M. Winaud, A. Rulmont, P. Tarte, J.Mater.
Sci. 25 (1990) 4008-4013[4] M.A. Subramanian, P.R. Rudolf,
A. Clearfield, J.Solid State Chem. 60 (1985) 172-181.[5]
P.E. Blöchl, Phys. Rev. B 50 (1994) 17953-17979[6] G.
Henkelman, B.P. Uberuaga, H. Jónsson, J.Chem. Phys. 113
(2000) 9901-9904},
month = {Jun},
date = {2015-06-14},
organization = {20th International Conference on Solid
State Ionics, Keystone, CO (USA), 14
Jun 2015 - 19 Jun 2015},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {IEK-1 / PGI-1 / JARA-ENERGY},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-1-20110106 /
$I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
pnm = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131) / HITEC -
Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and
Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131 / G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202298},
}