% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Makuch:202321,
author = {Makuch, Karol and Heinen, Marco and Abade, Gustavo Coelho
and Naegele, Gerhard},
title = {{R}otational self-diffusion in suspensions of charged
particles: simulations and revised {B}eenakker–{M}azur and
pairwise additivity methods},
journal = {Soft matter},
volume = {11},
number = {26},
issn = {1744-6848},
address = {London},
publisher = {Royal Soc. of Chemistry},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-04585},
pages = {5313 - 5326},
year = {2015},
abstract = {We present a comprehensive joint theory-simulation study of
rotational self-diffusion in suspensions of charged
particles whose interactions are modeled by the generic
hard-sphere plus repulsive Yukawa (HSY) pair potential.
Elaborate, high-precision simulation results for the
short-time rotational self-diffusion coefficient, Dr, are
discussed covering a broad range of fluid-phase state points
in the HSY model phase diagram. The salient trends in the
behavior of Dr as a function of reduced potential strength
and range, and particle concentration, are systematically
explored and physically explained. The simulation results
are further used to assess the performance of two
semi-analytic theoretical methods for calculating Dr. The
first theoretical method is a revised version of the
classical Beenakker–Mazur method (BM) adapted to
rotational diffusion which includes a highly improved
treatment of the salient many-particle hydrodynamic
interactions. The second method is an easy-to-implement
pairwise additivity (PA) method in which the hydrodynamic
interactions are treated on a full two-body level with
lubrication corrections included. The static pair
correlation functions required as the only input to both
theoretical methods are calculated using the accurate
Rogers–Young integral equation scheme. While the revised
BM method reproduces the general trends of the simulation
results, it significantly underestimates Dr. In contrast,
the PA method agrees well with the simulation results for Dr
even for intermediately concentrated systems. A simple
improvement of the PA method is presented which is
applicable for large concentrations.},
cin = {ICS-3},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-3-20110106},
pnm = {551 - Functional Macromolecules and Complexes (POF3-551)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-551},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000356806200015},
pubmed = {pmid:26054032},
doi = {10.1039/C5SM00056D},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202321},
}