000202392 001__ 202392
000202392 005__ 20220930130043.0
000202392 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/2015GL064622
000202392 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0094-8276
000202392 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1944-8007
000202392 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000358691300028
000202392 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/16074
000202392 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:4181623
000202392 037__ $$aFZJ-2015-04653
000202392 041__ $$aEnglish
000202392 082__ $$a550
000202392 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144847$$aStockinger, Michael$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000202392 245__ $$aInterception affects stable isotope driven streamwater transit time estimates
000202392 260__ $$aHoboken, NJ$$bWiley$$c2015
000202392 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000202392 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000202392 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1512378709_12597
000202392 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000202392 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000202392 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000202392 520__ $$aPrevious studies of streamwater transit time distributions (TTD) used isotope tracer information from open precipitation (OP) as inputs to lumped watershed models that simulate the discharge and isotopic composition time-series from convolutions of the effective precipitation, response time distribution, and TTDs. However, in forested catchments passage of rainfall through the forest canopy will alter the tracer signature of throughfall (TF) via interception. Here we test the effect of using TF instead of OP on TTD estimates. We sampled a 0.39 km2 catchment (Wüstebach, Germany) for a 19 month period using weekly precipitation and stream isotope data to evaluate changes in stream isotope simulation and TTDs. We found that TF had different effects on TTDs for δ18O and δ2H, with TF leading to up to four months shorter transit times. TTDs converged for both isotopes only when using TF. TF improved the stream isotope simulations. These results demonstratethe importance of canopy-induced isotope tracer changes in estimating streamwater TTDs in forested catchments.
000202392 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000202392 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000202392 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129567$$aLücke, Andreas$$b1$$ufzj
000202392 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMcDonnell, Jeffrey J.$$b2
000202392 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDiekkrüger, Bernd$$b3
000202392 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b4$$ufzj
000202392 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aBogena, Heye$$b5$$ufzj
000202392 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2021599-X$$a10.1002/2015GL064622$$gp. n/a - n/a$$n13$$p5299-5308$$tGeophysical research letters$$v42$$x0094-8276$$y2015
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202392/files/Stockinger_et_al-2015-Geophysical_Research_Letters.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000202392 8767_ $$92015-07-22$$d2015-08-17$$ePublication charges$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zUSD 500,-
000202392 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:202392$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000202392 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144847$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000202392 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129567$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000202392 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000202392 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129440$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b5$$kFZJ
000202392 9130_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vModelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies$$x0
000202392 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000202392 9141_ $$y2015
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bGEOPHYS RES LETT : 2013
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000202392 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000202392 920__ $$lyes
000202392 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000202392 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000202392 980__ $$ajournal
000202392 980__ $$aVDB
000202392 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000202392 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000202392 980__ $$aAPC