% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kreutzer:202707,
      author       = {Kreutzer, Sylvia and Weidner, Ralph and Fink, Gereon R.},
      title        = {{R}escaling {R}etinal {S}ize into {P}erceived {S}ize:
                      {E}vidence for an {O}ccipital and {P}arietal {B}ottleneck},
      journal      = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},
      volume       = {27},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1530-8898},
      address      = {Cambridge, Mass.},
      publisher    = {MIT Pr. Journals},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-04890},
      pages        = {1334 - 1343},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {The spatial and temporal context of an object influence its
                      perceived size. Two visual illusions illustrate this nicely:
                      the size adaptation effect and the Ebbinghaus illusion.
                      Whereas size adaptation affects size rescaling of a target
                      circle via a previously presented, differently sized adaptor
                      circle, the Ebbinghaus illusion alters perceived size by
                      virtue of surrounding circles. In the classical Ebbinghaus
                      setting, the surrounding circles are shown simultaneously
                      with the target. However, size underestimation persists when
                      the surrounding circles precede the target. Such a temporal
                      separation of inducer and target circles in both illusions
                      permits the comparison of BOLD signals elicited by two
                      displays that, although objectively identical, elicit
                      different percepts. The current study combined both
                      illusions in a factorial design to identify a presumed
                      common central mechanism involved in rescaling retinal into
                      perceived size. At the behavioral level, combining both
                      illusions did not affect perceived size further. At the
                      neural level, however, this combination induced functional
                      activation beyond that induced by either illusion
                      separately: An underadditive activation pattern was found
                      within left lingual gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, and
                      right superior parietal cortex. These findings provide
                      direct behavioral and functional evidence for the presence
                      of a neural bottleneck in rescaling retinal into perceived
                      size, a process vital for visual perception.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {400},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000355418000006},
      pubmed       = {pmid:25603028},
      doi          = {10.1162/jocn_a_00784},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202707},
}