% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Baak:202833,
      author       = {Baak, B. and Bock, O. and Dovern, A. and Saliger, J. and
                      Karbe, H. and Weiss-Blankenhorn, Peter},
      title        = {{D}eficits of reach-to-grasp coordination following stroke:
                      {C}omparison of instructed and natural movements},
      journal      = {Neuropsychologia},
      volume       = {77},
      issn         = {0028-3932},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-04992},
      pages        = {1 - 9},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {The present work evaluates whether stroke-induced deficits
                      of reach-to-grasp movements, established by typical
                      laboratory paradigms, transfer unconditionally to more
                      natural situations.Sixteen patients with a stroke to the
                      motor-dominant left hemisphere and 16 age- and
                      gender-matched healthy control subjects executed grasping
                      movements with their left (ipsilesional, non-dominant) hand.
                      All movements started in the same position, were aimed at
                      the same object positioned in the same location, and were
                      followed by forward displacement of that object along the
                      same path. Twenty movements were performed as a repetitive,
                      externally triggered task executed for their own sake
                      (context L, as in typical laboratory tasks). Twenty
                      movements were performed as part of a self-initiated action
                      sequence aimed at winning a reward (context E, similar to
                      many everyday situations). The kinematics and dynamics of
                      the transport, grasp and manipulation component of each
                      reach-to-grasp movement were quantified by 41
                      parameters.Analyses of variance yielded a significant effect
                      of Context for 29 parameters, a significant effect of Group
                      for 9 parameters (mostly related to the coupling of hand
                      transport and grip aperture), and a significant interaction
                      for 5 parameters (all related to the coupling of hand
                      transport and grip aperture). The interaction reflected the
                      fact that stroke patients' movement parameters were more
                      abnormal in context E than in context L.Our data indicate
                      that unilateral stroke degrades the grasp-transport
                      coupling, and that stroke-related motor deficits may be more
                      pronounced in a natural than in a laboratory context. Thus,
                      for stroke patients, assessments and rehabilitation regimes
                      should mainly use activities that are as natural as
                      possible.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000363815500001},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.07.018},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202833},
}