000020287 001__ 20287
000020287 005__ 20200705144228.0
000020287 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:22243886
000020287 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.001
000020287 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000301087800046
000020287 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:21807822
000020287 037__ $$aPreJuSER-20287
000020287 041__ $$aeng
000020287 082__ $$a333.7
000020287 084__ $$2WoS$$aEnvironmental Sciences
000020287 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhou, M.$$b0
000020287 245__ $$aNitrate leaching, direct and indirect nitrous oxide fluxes from sloping cropland in the purple soil area, southwestern China
000020287 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2012
000020287 300__ $$a361 - 368
000020287 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000020287 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000020287 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000020287 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000020287 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000020287 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000020287 440_0 $$08083$$aEnvironmental Pollution$$v162$$x0269-7491
000020287 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000020287 500__ $$aThis study was gratefully supported by National Program on Key Basic Research Plan of China (Grant No. 2012CB417101), the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (Grant No. 2011BAD31B03), the Helmholtz-CAS Joint Laboratory ENTRANCE and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40901144). Furthermore, we sincerely thank Mr. Yanqiang Wang, Zebin Zeng and other staff at Yanting station for their support in the field measurements.
000020287 520__ $$aThis study provides a combined dataset on N loss pathways and fluxes from sloping cropland in the purple soil area, southwestern China. A lysimeter experiment was conducted to quantify nitrate leaching (May 2004-May 2010) and N(2)O emission (May 2009-May 2010) losses. Nitrate leaching was the dominant N loss pathway and annual leaching fluxes ranged from 19.2 to 53.4 kg N ha(-1), with significant differences between individual observation years (P < 0.05). Direct N(2)O emissions due to N fertilizer use were 1.72 ± 0.34 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1), which corresponds to an emission factor of 0.58 ± 0.12%. However, indirect N(2)O emissions caused by nitrate leaching and surface runoff N losses, may contribute another 0.15-0.42 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1). Our study shows that nitrate leaching lowered direct N(2)O emissions, highlighting the importance for a better understanding of the tradeoff between direct and indirect N(2)O emissions for the development of meaningful N(2)O emission strategies.
000020287 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000020287 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000020287 65320 $$2Author$$aNitrate leaching
000020287 65320 $$2Author$$aDirect N2O emission
000020287 65320 $$2Author$$aIndirect N2O emission
000020287 65320 $$2Author$$aSloping cropland
000020287 65320 $$2Author$$aPurple soil
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aChina
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aEnvironmental Monitoring
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFertilizers: analysis
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aNitrates: analysis
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aNitrogen Cycle
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aNitrous Oxide: analysis
000020287 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aSoil: analysis
000020287 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aFertilizers
000020287 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aNitrates
000020287 650_7 $$00$$2NLM Chemicals$$aSoil
000020287 650_7 $$010024-97-2$$2NLM Chemicals$$aNitrous Oxide
000020287 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhu, B.$$b1
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aButterbach-Bahl, K.$$b2
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, T.$$b3
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBergmann, J.$$b4
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142357$$aBrüggemann, N.$$b5$$uFZJ
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWang, Z.$$b6
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, T.$$b7
000020287 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKuang, F.$$b8
000020287 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2013037-5$$a10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.001$$gVol. 162, p. 361 - 368$$p361 - 368$$q162<361 - 368$$tEnvironmental pollution$$v162$$x0269-7491$$y2012
000020287 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.12.001
000020287 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:20287$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000020287 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000020287 9141_ $$y2012
000020287 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000020287 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000020287 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000020287 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)135611
000020287 980__ $$aVDB
000020287 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000020287 980__ $$ajournal
000020287 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000020287 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED