| Home > Publications database > Evaluation of seasonal variability of soil biogeochemical properties in aggregate-size fractioned soil under different tillages > print |
| 001 | 202909 | ||
| 005 | 20210129220248.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 doi |a 10.1016/j.still.2015.02.008 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 ISSN |a 0167-1987 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 ISSN |a 1879-3444 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 WOS |a 10.1016/j.still.2015.02.008 |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |2 WOS |a WOS:000353093200005 |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2015-05055 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 630 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |a Panettieri, M. |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Evaluation of seasonal variability of soil biogeochemical properties in aggregate-size fractioned soil under different tillages |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |b Elsevier Science |c 2015 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1438333325_1376 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a An augment of soil organic matter (SUM) in agricultural lands is mandatory to improve soil quality and fertility and to limit greenhouse gases emissions. A better protection of SUM from degradation is seconded to its inclusion in aggregates and to the formation of organo-mineral interactions with the clay fraction within the soil matrix. Under Mediterranean conditions, conservation agriculture (CA) has been widely related with macro-aggregates formation, SUM protection, and to an improvement of soil fertility and crop yields. The objective of this work was to evaluate the biogeochemical properties of five aggregate-size fractions obtained by dry sieving of a Calcic Fluvisol of an experimental farm managed under three different tillages. Soil aggregates distribution, total organic carbon (TUC), labile carbon pools, and enzymatic activities were measured in 2 different periods of the same agricultural campaign. CPMAS C-13 NMR analyses were also performed to elucidate the structure of preserved SOM. The results evidenced seasonal variability in aggregate distribution, labile carbon pools and dehydrogenase activity (DHA), whereas TOC, permanganate oxidizable carbon (POxC), and p-glucosidase activity demonstrated to be reliable soil quality indices for soil fractions. The NMR analyses showed a better SUM preservation under conservation tillages, due to higher plant litter inputs and/or higher amount of necromass derived compounds if compared with traditional tillage. Particularly interesting are the results of the circle divide 0.5-1 mm fraction, in which different trends were found for beta-Glu and several organic compound classes if compared with the other fractions. Possibly, in this fraction are concentrated most of the products from cellulose depolymerization stabilized by organo-mineral interactions. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |c POF3-255 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129438 |a Berns, A. E. |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |a Knicker, H. |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |a Murillo, J. M. |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |a Madejón, E. |b 4 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |0 PERI:(DE-600)1498737-5 |a 10.1016/j.still.2015.02.008 |g Vol. 151, p. 39 - 49 |p 39 - 49 |t Soil & tillage research |v 151 |x 0167-1987 |y 2015 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.pdf |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.gif?subformat=icon |x icon |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |x icon-1440 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |x icon-180 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |x icon-640 |y Restricted |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/202909/files/1-s2.0-S0167198715000537-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa |x pdfa |y Restricted |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:202909 |p VDB |p VDB:Earth_Environment |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129438 |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |b 1 |k FZJ |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |a DE-HGF |l Terrestrische Umwelt |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2015 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |a JCR |b SOIL TILL RES : 2013 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |a DBCoverage |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |a DBCoverage |b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |a WoS |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |a DBCoverage |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |a WoS |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |a DBCoverage |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |a DBCoverage |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |a IF < 5 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|