000203156 001__ 203156
000203156 005__ 20210129220309.0
000203156 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.011
000203156 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-1694
000203156 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-2707
000203156 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000355885600042
000203156 037__ $$aFZJ-2015-05161
000203156 082__ $$a690
000203156 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMangel, Adam R.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000203156 245__ $$aResolving precipitation induced water content profiles by inversion of dispersive GPR data: A numerical study
000203156 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2015
000203156 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1439189439_17763
000203156 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000203156 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000203156 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000203156 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000203156 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000203156 520__ $$aSurface-based ground-penetrating radar (GPR) measurements have significant potential for monitoring dynamic hydrologic processes at multiple scales in time and space. At early times during infiltration into a soil, the zone above the wetting front may act as a low-velocity waveguide that traps GPR waves, thereby causing dispersion and making interpretation of the data using standard methods difficult. In this work, we show that the dispersion is dependent upon the distribution of water within the waveguide, which is controlled by soil hydrologic properties. Simulations of infiltration were performed by varying the n-parameter of the Mualem–van Genuchten equation using HYDRUS-1D; the associated GPR data were simulated to evaluate the influence of dispersion. We observed a notable decrease in wave dispersion as the sharpness of the wetting front profile decreased. Given the sensitivity of the dispersion effect to the wetting front profile, we also evaluated whether the water content distribution can be determined through inversion of the dispersive GPR data. We found that a global grid search combined with the simplex algorithm was able to estimate the average water content when the wetted zone is divided into 2 layers. This approach was incapable, however, of representing the gradational nature of the water content distribution behind the wetting front. In contrast, the shuffled complex evolution algorithm was able to constrain a piece-wise linear function to closely match the shallow gradational water content profile. In both the layered and piece-wise linear case, the sensitivity of the dispersive data dropped sharply below the wetting front, which in this case was around 20 cm, i.e., twice the average wavelength, for a 900 MHz GPR survey. This study demonstrates that dispersive GPR data has significant potential for capturing the early-time dynamics of infiltration that cannot be obtained with standard GPR analysis approaches.
000203156 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000203156 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000203156 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoysey, Stephen M. J.$$b1
000203156 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129561$$avan der Kruk, Jan$$b2
000203156 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473173-3$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.011$$gVol. 525, p. 496 - 505$$p496 - 505$$tJournal of hydrology$$v525$$x0022-1694$$y2015
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000203156 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203156/files/1-s2.0-S0022169415002607-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000203156 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:203156$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ HYDROL : 2013
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000203156 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000203156 9141_ $$y2015
000203156 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129561$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b2$$kFZJ
000203156 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000203156 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000203156 980__ $$ajournal
000203156 980__ $$aVDB
000203156 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000203156 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED