% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{A:203203,
      author       = {Ač, Alexander and Malenovský, Zbyněk and Olejníčková,
                      Julie and Gallé, Alexander and Rascher, Uwe and Mohammed,
                      Gina},
      title        = {{M}eta-analysis assessing potential of steady-state
                      chlorophyll fluorescence for remote sensing detection of
                      plant water, temperature and nitrogen stressplant},
      journal      = {Remote sensing of environment},
      volume       = {168},
      issn         = {0034-4257},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-05201},
      pages        = {420 - 436},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {Many laboratory studies investigating chlorophyll
                      fluorescence (F) of plants have provided sufficient evidence
                      of the functional link between dynamic changes in
                      photosynthetic activity and F emissions. Far fewer studies,
                      however, have been devoted to detailed analysis of F
                      emission under steady-state conditions, which may be
                      amenable to measurement by passive spectroradiometers
                      onboard airborne or satellite missions. Here, we provide a
                      random-effects meta-analysis of studies using both passively
                      (sun-induced) and actively (e.g. laser-induced) measured
                      steady-state F for detecting stress reactions in terrestrial
                      vegetation. Specifically, we review behaviour of F in red
                      and far-red wavelengths, and also the red to far-red F
                      ratio, for plants physiologically stressed by water deficit,
                      temperature extremes, and nitrogen insufficiency. Results
                      suggest that water stress is, in general, associated with a
                      decline in red and far-red F signal intensity measured at
                      both leaf and canopy levels, whereas the red to far-red F
                      ratio displays an inconsistent behaviour. Chilling, for
                      which only studies with active measurements at the leaf
                      level are available, significantly increased red and far-red
                      F, whereas heat stress produced a less convincing decrease
                      in both F emissions, notably in canopies measured passively.
                      The clearest indicator of temperature stress was the F
                      ratio, which declined significantly and consistently. The F
                      ratio was also the strongest indicator of nitrogen
                      deficiency, revealing a nearly uniformly increasing pattern
                      driven by predominantly declining far-red F. Although
                      significant knowledge gaps were encountered for certain
                      scales and F measurement techniques, the analyses indicate
                      that future airborne or space-borne acquisitions of both red
                      and far-red F signals would be beneficial for timely
                      detection of plant stress events.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {050},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000361405500032},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.rse.2015.07.022},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203203},
}