Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents > print

001     203223
005     20210129220322.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/nph.13571
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0028-646X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1469-8137
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/9344
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000365392100013
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:4308263
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:26197869
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2015-05212
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 580
100 1 _ |a Poorter, Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a How does biomass distribution change with size and differ among species? An analysis for 1200 plant species from five continents
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|c 2015
|b Wiley-Blackwell
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1444726641_31780
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a We compiled a global database for leaf, stem and root biomass representing c. 11 000 records for c. 1200 herbaceous and woody species grown under either controlled or field conditions. We used this data set to analyse allometric relationships and fractional biomass distribution to leaves, stems and roots. We tested whether allometric scaling exponents are generally constant across plant sizes as predicted by metabolic scaling theory, or whether instead they change dynamically with plant size. We also quantified interspecific variation in biomass distribution among plant families and functional groups. Across all species combined, leaf vs stem and leaf vs root scaling exponents decreased from c. 1.00 for small plants to c. 0.60 for the largest trees considered. Evergreens had substantially higher leaf mass fractions (LMFs) than deciduous species, whereas graminoids maintained higher root mass fractions (RMFs) than eudicotyledonous herbs. These patterns do not support the hypothesis of fixed allometric exponents. Rather, continuous shifts in allometric exponents with plant size during ontogeny and evolution are the norm. Across seed plants, variation in biomass distribution among species is related more to function than phylogeny. We propose that the higher LMF of evergreens at least partly compensates for their relatively low leaf area : leaf mass ratio.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Jagodzinski, Andrzej M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ruiz-Peinado, Ricardo
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Kuyah, Shem
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Luo, Yunjian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a Oleksyn, Jacek
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Usoltsev, Vladimir A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Buckley, Thomas N.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Reich, Peter B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Sack, Lawren
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/nph.13571
|g p. n/a - n/a
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1472194-6
|n 3
|p 736–749
|t The @new phytologist
|v 208
|y 2015
|x 0028-646X
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203223/files/Poorter_et_al-2015-New_Phytologist.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:203223
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2015
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b NEW PHYTOL : 2013
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b NEW PHYTOL : 2013
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 1 _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21