% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Prein:203404,
author = {Prein, Andreas F. and Langhans, Wolfgang and Fosser,
Giorgia and Ferrone, Andrew and Ban, Nikolina and Görgen,
Klaus and Keller, Michael and Tölle, Merja and Gutjahr,
Oliver and Feser, Frauke and Brisson, Erwan and Kollet,
Stefan and Schmidli, Juerg and van Lipzig, Nicole P. M. and
Leung, Ruby},
title = {{A} review on regional convection-permitting climate
modeling: {D}emonstrations, prospects, and challenges},
journal = {Reviews of geophysics},
volume = {53},
number = {2},
issn = {8755-1209},
address = {Hoboken, NJ},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-05347},
pages = {323 - 361},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Regional climate modeling using convection-permitting
models (CPMs; horizontal grid spacing <4 km) emerges as a
promising framework to provide more reliable climate
information on regional to local scales compared to
traditionally used large-scale models (LSMs; horizontal grid
spacing >10 km). CPMs no longer rely on convection
parameterization schemes, which had been identified as a
major source of errors and uncertainties in LSMs. Moreover,
CPMs allow for a more accurate representation of surface and
orography fields. The drawback of CPMs is the high demand on
computational resources. For this reason, first CPM climate
simulations only appeared a decade ago. In this study, we
aim to provide a common basis for CPM climate simulations by
giving a holistic review of the topic. The most important
components in CPMs such as physical parameterizations and
dynamical formulations are discussed critically. An overview
of weaknesses and an outlook on required future developments
is provided. Most importantly, this review presents the
consolidated outcome of studies that addressed the added
value of CPM climate simulations compared to LSMs.
Improvements are evident mostly for climate statistics
related to deep convection, mountainous regions, or extreme
events. The climate change signals of CPM simulations
suggest an increase in flash floods, changes in hail storm
characteristics, and reductions in the snowpack over
mountains. In conclusion, CPMs are a very promising tool for
future climate research. However, coordinated modeling
programs are crucially needed to advance parameterizations
of unresolved physics and to assess the full potential of
CPMs.},
cin = {IBG-3 / JSC},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 / I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255) / 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical
Methods (POF3-511)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000358322200005},
pubmed = {pmid:27478878},
doi = {10.1002/2014RG000475},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/203404},
}