000204999 001__ 204999
000204999 005__ 20240619083514.0
000204999 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/9150
000204999 037__ $$aFZJ-2015-05504
000204999 041__ $$aEnglish
000204999 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131034$$aWiegand, Simone$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000204999 1112_ $$aJoint European Thermodynamics Conference 2015$$cNancy$$d2015-05-20 - 2015-05-22$$gJETC$$wFrance
000204999 245__ $$aThermophoresis of charged colloidal spheres and rods
000204999 260__ $$c2015
000204999 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)6$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aConference Presentation$$bconf$$mconf$$s1441718455_16210$$xAfter Call
000204999 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000204999 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOther
000204999 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aLECTURE_SPEECH
000204999 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000204999 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000204999 520__ $$aThermophoresis or Thermal diffusion, which is also known as the Ludwig–Soret effect, is the phenomenon where mass transport is induced by a temperature gradient in a multi-component system. So far there is no microscopic understanding for fluids. In the recent years the « heat of transfer » concept has been successfully applied to non-polar systems, but in aqueous systems the situations is complicated due to charge effects and strong specific cross interactions so that this concept fails.Recently Dhont and Briels [1] calculated the double-layer contribution to the single-particle thermal diffusion coefficient of charged, spherical colloids with arbitrary double-layer thickness. In this approach three forces are taken into account, which contribute to the total thermophoretic force on a charged colloidal sphere due its double layer: i) the force FW that results from the temperature dependence of the internal electrostatic energy W of the double layer, ii) the electric force Fel with which the temperature-induced non-spherically symmetric double-layer potential acts on the surface charges of the colloidal sphere and iii) the solvent-friction force Fsol on the surface of the colloidal sphere due to the solvent flow that is induced in the double layer because of its asymmetry. This concept has successfully been used to describe the Soret coefficient of Ludox particles as function of the Debye length [2] (cf. Fig. 1). The surface charge density of the Ludox particles is independently obtained from electrophoresis measurements, the size of the colloidal particles is obtained from electron microscopy, and the Debye length is calculated from the ion concentration. Therefore the only adjustable parameter in the comparison with theory is the intercept at zero Debye length, which measures the contribution to the Soret coefficient of the solvation layer and possibly the colloid core material.Later the concept was extended for charged colloidal rods [3]. As model system we used the charged, rod-like fd-virus. The wild type fd-virus has a contour length L of 880 nm, a radius R of 3.4 nm, and a persistence length LP of 2.2 µm. The Soret coefficient of the fd-viruses increases monotonically with increasing Debye length (cf. Fig. 1), while there is a relatively weak dependence on the rod-concentration when the ionic strength is kept constant. Additionally to the intercept at zero Debye length we used the surface charge density as an adjustable parameter. Experimentally we found a surface charge density of 0.0500.003 e/nm2, which compares well the surface charge density, of 0.0660.004 e/nm2, which has been determined by electrophoresis measurements taking into account the ion condensation.All experiments so far have been performed with the so-called infrared thermal diffusion forced Rayleigh scattering technique [4], with a writing wavelength of 980 nm, which corresponds to an absorption band of water with an approximate optical density equal to OD=0.5 cm-1. This method uses the refractive index contrast between the different components and is therefore typically limited to binary mixtures. In order to study also biological colloids in buffer solutions we are presently developing a microscopic cell with heated wires. First results for some fluorescently labelled polystyrene lattices in the microwire cell are presented in comparison with thermal diffusion forced Rayleigh scattering measurements. Figure 1: (A) Soret coefficient, ST, as function of the Debye length for Ludox particles and the wild type fd-virus. (B) TEM image of the Ludox particle and (C) the corresponding size distribution. (D) TEM image of the fd-virus.REFERENCES[1] J.K.G. Dhont and W.J. Briels, Eur. Phys. J. E 25, 61(2008).[2] H. Ning, J.K.G. Dhont, and S. Wiegand, Langmuir, 24, 2426(2008).[3] Z. Wang, H. Kriegs, J. Buitenhuis, J.K.G. Dhont, and S. Wiegand, Soft Matter, 9, 8697(2013).[4] S. Wiegand, H. Ning, and H. Kriegs, J. Phys. Chem. B, 111, 14169(2007).
000204999 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-551$$a551 - Functional Macromolecules and Complexes (POF3-551)$$cPOF3-551$$fPOF III$$x0
000204999 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144600$$aAfanasenkau, Dzmitry$$b1$$ufzj
000204999 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)164236$$aSyshchyk, Olga$$b2
000204999 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)144087$$aWang, Zilin$$b3$$ufzj
000204999 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130577$$aBuitenhuis, Johan$$b4$$ufzj
000204999 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)130616$$aDhont, Jan K.G.$$b5$$ufzj
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000204999 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/204999/files/Wiegand.jpg?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700$$yOpenAccess
000204999 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:204999$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000204999 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131034$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000204999 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144600$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000204999 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)144087$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000204999 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130577$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000204999 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)130616$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b5$$kFZJ
000204999 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-551$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-550$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lBioSoft – Fundamentals for future Technologies in the fields of Soft Matter and Life Sciences$$vFunctional Macromolecules and Complexes$$x0
000204999 9141_ $$y2015
000204999 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000204999 920__ $$lyes
000204999 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)ICS-3-20110106$$kICS-3$$lWeiche Materie $$x0
000204999 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000204999 980__ $$aconf
000204999 980__ $$aVDB
000204999 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000204999 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICS-3-20110106