001     20783
005     20200423203221.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:22523423
024 7 _ |2 pmc
|a pmc:PMC3394648
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1093/aob/mcs082
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000306407800028
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1934776
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-20783
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 580
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |a Postma, Johannes Auke
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144879
245 _ _ |a Complementarity in Root Architecture for Nutrient Uptake in Ancient Maize/Bean and Maize/Bean/Squash Polycultures
260 _ _ |a Oxford
|b Oxford University Press
|c 2012
300 _ _ |a 521-534
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Annals of Botany
|x 0305-7364
|0 13861
|y 521 - 534
|v 110
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a During their domestication, maize, bean and squash evolved in polycultures grown by small-scale farmers in the Americas. Polycultures often overyield on low-fertility soils, which are a primary production constraint in low-input agriculture. We hypothesized that root architectural differences among these crops causes niche complementarity and thereby greater nutrient acquisition than corresponding monocultures.A functional-structural plant model, SimRoot, was used to simulate the first 40 d of growth of these crops in monoculture and polyculture and to determine the effects of root competition on nutrient uptake and biomass production of each plant on low-nitrogen, -phosphorus and -potassium soils.Squash, the earliest domesticated crop, was most sensitive to low soil fertility, while bean, the most recently domesticated crop, was least sensitive to low soil fertility. Nitrate uptake and biomass production were up to 7 % greater in the polycultures than in the monocultures, but only when root architecture was taken into account. Enhanced nitrogen capture in polycultures was independent of nitrogen fixation by bean. Root competition had negligible effects on phosphorus or potassium uptake or biomass production.We conclude that spatial niche differentiation caused by differences in root architecture allows polycultures to overyield when plants are competing for mobile soil resources. However, direct competition for immobile resources might be negligible in agricultural systems. Interspecies root spacing may also be too large to allow maize to benefit from root exudates of bean or squash. Above-ground competition for light, however, may have strong feedbacks on root foraging for immobile nutrients, which may increase cereal growth more than it will decrease the growth of the other crops. We note that the order of domestication of crops correlates with increasing nutrient efficiency, rather than production potential.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a oThree sisters'
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a polyculture
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a root architecture
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a SimRoot
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a functionalstructural model
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a nutrient deficiency
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a maize
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a bean
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a squash
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a niche complementarity
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a root competition
700 1 _ |a Lynch, J.P.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1093/aob/mcs082
|g Vol. 110
|q 110
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1461328-1
|t Annals of botany
|v 110
|y 2012
|x 0305-7364
|p 521-534
|n 2
856 7 _ |2 Pubmed Central
|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3394648
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/20783/files/FZJ-20783.pdf
|z Published final document.
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:20783
|p VDB
913 1 _ |b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2012
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a Allianz-Lizenz / DFG
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0400
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|g IBG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)136492
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21