% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Engemann:21047,
      author       = {Engemann, D.A. and Bzdok, D. and Eickhoff, S.B. and
                      Vogeley, K. and Schilbach, L.},
      title        = {{G}ames people play - towards an enactive view of
                      cooperation in social neuroscience},
      journal      = {Frontiers in human neuroscience},
      volume       = {6},
      issn         = {1662-5161},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-21047},
      pages        = {1-14},
      year         = {2012},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {The field of social neuroscience has made considerable
                      progress in unraveling the neural correlates of human
                      cooperation by making use of brain imaging methods. Within
                      this field, neuroeconomic research has drawn on paradigms
                      from experimental economics, such as the Prisoner's Dilemma
                      (PD) and the Trust Game. These paradigms capture the topic
                      of conflict in cooperation, while focusing strongly on
                      outcome-related decision processes. Cooperation, however,
                      does not equate with that perspective, but relies on
                      additional psychological processes and events, including
                      shared intentions and mutually coordinated joint action.
                      These additional facets of cooperation have been
                      successfully addressed by research in developmental
                      psychology, cognitive science, and social philosophy.
                      Corresponding neuroimaging data, however, is still sparse.
                      Therefore, in this paper, we present a juxtaposition of
                      these mutually related but mostly independent trends in
                      cooperation research. We propose that the neuroscientific
                      study of cooperation could benefit from paradigms and
                      concepts employed in developmental psychology and social
                      philosophy. Bringing both to a neuroimaging environment
                      might allow studying the neural correlates of cooperation by
                      using formal models of decision-making as well as capturing
                      the neural responses that underlie joint action scenarios,
                      thus, promising to advance our understanding of the nature
                      of human cooperation.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {INM-1 / INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
                      89572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF2-89572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572},
      shelfmark    = {Neurosciences / Psychology},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:22675293},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC3365482},
      UT           = {WOS:000304860900001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnhum.2012.00148},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21047},
}