guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants > print |
| Home > Publications database > Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants > print |
| 001 | 21191 | ||
| 005 | 20200423203229.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:22645597 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmc:PMC3355755 |2 pmc |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3389/fpls.2012.00070 |2 DOI |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1664-462X |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000208837900071 |2 WOS |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/7469 |2 Handle |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a PreJuSER-21191 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a eng |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 570 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Temperton, V.M. |b 0 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Effects of four different restoration treatments on the natural abundance of 15N stable isotopes in plants |
| 260 | _ | _ | |c 2012 |a Lausanne |b Frontiers Media |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a 1 - 12 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 440 | _ | 0 | |a Frontiers in Plant Science |0 25925 |y 70 |v 3 |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012 |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a δ(15)N signals in plant and soil material integrate over a number of biogeochemical processes related to nitrogen (N) and therefore provide information on net effects of multiple processes on N dynamics. In general little is known in many grassland restoration projects on soil-plant N dynamics in relation to the restoration treatments. In particular, δ(15)N signals may be a useful tool to assess whether abiotic restoration treatments have produced the desired result. In this study we used the range of abiotic and biotic conditions provided by a restoration experiment to assess to whether the restoration treatments and/or plant functional identity and legume neighborhood affected plant δ(15)N signals. The restoration treatments consisted of hay transfer and topsoil removal, thus representing increasing restoration effort, from no restoration measures, through biotic manipulation to major abiotic manipulation. We measured δ(15)N and %N in six different plant species (two non-legumes and four legumes) across the restoration treatments. We found that restoration treatments were clearly reflected in δ(15)N of the non-legume species, with very depleted δ(15)N associated with low soil N, and our results suggest this may be linked to uptake of ammonium (rather than nitrate). The two non-legume species differed considerably in their δ(15)N signals, which may be related to the two species forming different kinds of mycorrhizal symbioses. Plant δ(15)N signals could clearly separate legumes from non-legumes, but our results did not allow for an assessment of legume neighborhood effects on non-legume δ(15)N signals. We discuss our results in the light of what the δ(15)N signals may be telling us about plant-soil N dynamics and their potential value as an indicator for N dynamics in restoration. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a Terrestrische Umwelt |c P24 |2 G:(DE-HGF) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to Pubmed |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Märtin, L.L.A. |b 1 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB102833 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Röder, D. |b 2 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB85274 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Lücke, A. |b 3 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129567 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kiehl, K. |b 4 |u FZJ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB85275 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |0 PERI:(DE-600)2613694-6 |a 10.3389/fpls.2012.00070 |g Vol. 3, p. 70 |p 70 |q 3<70 |t Frontiers in plant science: FPLS |v 3 |x 1664-462X |y 2012 |
| 856 | 7 | _ | |2 Pubmed Central |u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3355755 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21191/files/FZJ-21191.pdf |y OpenAccess |z Published final document. |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21191/files/FZJ-21191.jpg?subformat=icon-1440 |x icon-1440 |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21191/files/FZJ-21191.jpg?subformat=icon-180 |x icon-180 |y OpenAccess |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21191/files/FZJ-21191.jpg?subformat=icon-640 |x icon-640 |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:21191 |p openaire |p open_access |p driver |p VDB |p dnbdelivery |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |b Erde und Umwelt |k P24 |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240 |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200 |v Terrestrische Umwelt |x 0 |
| 913 | 2 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v Plant Science |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2012 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-SA 3.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC3 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer review unknown |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0040 |2 StatID |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |g IBG |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |k IBG-2 |l Pflanzenwissenschaften |g IBG |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |x 1 |
| 970 | _ | _ | |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)137094 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a ConvertedRecord |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a JUWEL |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|