% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bauer:21231,
author = {Bauer, J. and Weihermueller, L. and Huisman, J.A. and
Herbst, M. and Graf, A. and Sequaris, J.M. and Vereecken,
H.},
title = {{I}nverse determination of heterotrophic soil respiration
response to temperature and water content under field
conditions},
journal = {Biogeochemistry},
volume = {108},
number = {1-3},
issn = {0168-2563},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {JSTOR},
reportid = {PreJuSER-21231},
pages = {119-134},
year = {2012},
note = {This research was supported by the German Research
Foundation DFG (Transregional Collaborative Research Centre
32-Patterns in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere systems:
monitoring, modelling and data assimilation), TERENO
(Terrestrial Environmental Observatories) of the Helmholtz
Gemeinschaft and by the Hessian initiative for the
development of scientific and economic excellence (LOEWE) at
the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BiK-F),
Frankfurt/Main. We thank Axel Knaps and Rainer Harms for
providing the climate data. The organic carbon content of
the soil was analysed by the Central Division of Analytical
Chemistry at the Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH. We would
like to thank Claudia Walraf and Stefan Masjoshustmann for
the physical fractionation of the soil samples and Ludger
Bornemann (Institute of Crop Science and Resource
Conservation-Division of Soil Science, University of Bonn)
for the analysis of black carbon. We are grateful to Horst
Hardelauf for modifications of the model source code.
Furthermore, we thank three anonymous reviewers for their
helpful advices.},
abstract = {Heterotrophic soil respiration is an important flux within
the global carbon cycle. Exact knowledge of the response
functions for soil temperature and soil water content is
crucial for a reliable prediction of soil carbon turnover.
The classical statistical approach for the in situ
determination of the temperature response (Q(10) or
activation energy) of field soil respiration has been
criticised for neglecting confounding factors, such as
spatial and temporal changes in soil water content and soil
organic matter. The aim of this paper is to evaluate an
alternative method to estimate the temperature and soil
water content response of heterotrophic soil respiration.
The new method relies on inverse parameter estimation using
a 1-dimensional CO2 transport and carbon turnover model.
Inversion results showed that different formulations of the
temperature response function resulted in estimated response
factors that hardly deviated over the entire range of soil
water content and for temperature below 25A degrees C. For
higher temperatures, the temperature response was highly
uncertain due to the infrequent occurrence of soil
temperatures above 25A degrees C. The temperature
sensitivity obtained using inverse modelling was within the
range of temperature sensitivities estimated from
statistical processing of the data. It was concluded that
inverse parameter estimation is a promising tool for the
determination of the temperature and soil water content
response of soil respiration. Future synthetic model studies
should investigate to what extent the inverse modelling
approach can disentangle confounding factors that typically
affect statistical estimates of the sensitivity of soil
respiration to temperature and soil water content.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Geosciences, Multidisciplinary},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000300659300009},
doi = {10.1007/s10533-011-9583-1},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21231},
}