000021322 001__ 21322
000021322 005__ 20200702121620.0
000021322 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.001
000021322 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000302106900010
000021322 037__ $$aPreJuSER-21322
000021322 041__ $$aeng
000021322 082__ $$a330
000021322 084__ $$2WoS$$aAgriculture, Multidisciplinary
000021322 084__ $$2WoS$$aEcology
000021322 084__ $$2WoS$$aEnvironmental Sciences
000021322 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPfab, H.$$b0
000021322 245__ $$aInfluence of a nitrification inhibitor and of placed N-fertilization on N2O fluxes from a vegetable cropped loamy soil
000021322 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2012
000021322 300__ $$a91 - 101
000021322 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000021322 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000021322 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000021322 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000021322 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000021322 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000021322 440_0 $$025963$$aAGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT$$v150
000021322 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000021322 500__ $$aThis study was financed by the Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt (AZ 25420). We further want to thank for their invaluable help: Hans Bucher, Heidi Zimmermann, Hinrich Bremer and Maria Ruckwied, for assistance in the lab, the University's Academic workshop for technical assistance, Dr. Rudolf Schulz, Tobias Hartmann, our student assistants and the crew of the experimental farm "Heidfeldhof".
000021322 520__ $$aArable soils are a major source of the climate relevant trace gas nitrous oxide (N2O). Although N2O emissions from soils increase with the amount of N-fertilizer, there is still a lack of data for intensively fertilized systems, such as vegetable production. We investigated the effect of an ammonium sulfate nitrate (ASN) fertilization either placed or broadcast applied combined with a nitrification inhibitor (3,4-dimethylepyrazole phosphate (DMPP)) on soil surface N2O fluxes as compared to conventional broadcast ASN fertilization in a lettuce-cauliflower rotation over two years of measurement. Except for a lower cauliflower yield in the second experimental year with placed fertilization, no differences in yields between the fertilized treatments were observed. Annual cumulative N2O emissions of the conventionally fertilized treatment were 8.8 and 4.7 kg N2O-N ha(-1) yr(-1) for the first and second experimental year, respectively, indicating a high inter-annual variability.The addition of the nitrification inhibitor significantly reduced N2O emissions during the cropping season and also during the winter period, resulting in an annual reduction of 45 and 40% as compared to the conventionally fertilized (CONV) treatment. The reason for the lower N2O release in the DMPP treatment as compared to the conventionally fertilized treatment remained unclear. Since we did not find any significant differences in the mineral N pools during periods with distinctive inhibition, this can be ruled out as reason for the lower N2O release in the DMPP treatment. We found lower soil respiration in the DMPP treatment during several months starting about six weeks after fertilizer application.In contrast to the treatment with nitrification inhibitor, the placed fertilization as an N-depot (fertilizer bands inserted into the soil) did not reduce annual N2O emissions, although the ratio of ammonium (NH4+) to nitrate (NO3-) in the first weeks after N-application indicate inhibition of nitrification in the fertilizer depot. We assume that, even though NH4+ concentrations in the depots were high, toxicity was not sufficient for a complete inhibition of microbial activity in the surrounding of the depots, resulting in considerable N2O production. The emission factors calculated for CONV treatment were 1.6 and 0.8% for the first and second experimental year, respectively. For the treatment with nitrification inhibitor (NI), they were only 0.9 and 0.5%; for the treatment with placed fertilization as an N-depot (DEPOT) 2.0 and 0.8%. They were thus within the range proposed by the guidelines of the IPCC (2006).However, although the N-input related N2O emission factors were within the range proposed by the guidelines of the IPCC, the absolute N2O emissions from the intensively fertilized vegetable field were high. For effective, but environmentally sound vegetable production, a deeper understanding of nitrification inhibitory strategies is necessary. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
000021322 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000021322 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aN2O emission
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aVegetables
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aNitrification inhibitor
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aDMPP
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aPlaced fertilization
000021322 65320 $$2Author$$aCULTAN
000021322 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000021322 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPalmer, I.$$b1
000021322 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBuegger, F.$$b2
000021322 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB99792$$aFiedler, S.$$b3$$uFZJ
000021322 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMüller, T.$$b4
000021322 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRuser, R.$$b5
000021322 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2013743-6$$a10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.001$$gVol. 150, p. 91 - 101$$p91 - 101$$q150<91 - 101$$tAgriculture, ecosystems & environment$$v150$$x0167-8809$$y2012
000021322 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.01.001
000021322 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:21322$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0040$$2StatID$$aPeer review unknown
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000021322 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000021322 9141_ $$y2012
000021322 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000021322 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000021322 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000021322 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)137292
000021322 980__ $$aVDB
000021322 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000021322 980__ $$ajournal
000021322 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000021322 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED