000021346 001__ 21346
000021346 005__ 20200705144232.0
000021346 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.004
000021346 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000304217500004
000021346 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:21808136
000021346 037__ $$aPreJuSER-21346
000021346 041__ $$aeng
000021346 082__ $$a690
000021346 084__ $$2WoS$$aComputer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
000021346 084__ $$2WoS$$aEngineering, Environmental
000021346 084__ $$2WoS$$aEnvironmental Sciences
000021346 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPalosuo, T.$$b0
000021346 245__ $$aA multi-model comparison of soil carbon assessment of a coniferous forest stand
000021346 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2012
000021346 300__ $$a38 - 49
000021346 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000021346 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000021346 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000021346 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000021346 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000021346 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000021346 440_0 $$013262$$aEnvironmental Modelling and Software$$v35$$x1364-8152
000021346 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000021346 500__ $$aThis study was initiated in a modelling workshop of COST639 in Vienna, Austria, in May 2009 and discussions were continued in Vilnius in September 2009. T. Palosuo was funded through the Agriyasso Research Project funded by the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of Finland and by MTT strategic funds of the IAM-Tools and MITAG projects. We wish to thank Reimund Rotter and three anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments on the manuscript.
000021346 520__ $$aWe simulated soil carbon stock dynamics of an Austrian coniferous forest stand with five soil-only models (Q, ROMUL, RothC, SoilCO2/RothC and Yasso07) and three plant soil models (CENTURY, Coup-Model and Forest-DNDC) for an 18-year period and the decomposition of a litter pulse over a 100-year period. The objectives of the study were to assess the consistency in soil carbon estimates applying a multi-model comparison and to present and discuss the sources of uncertainties that create the differences in model results. Additionally, we discuss the applicability of different modelling approaches from the view point of large-scale carbon assessments.Our simulation results showed a wide range in soil carbon stocks and stock change estimates reflecting substantial uncertainties in model estimates. The measured stock change estimate decreased much more than the model predictions. Model results varied not only due to the model structure and applied parameters, but also due to different input information and assumptions applied during the modelling processes. Initialization procedures applied with the models induced large differences among the modelled soil carbon stocks and stock change estimates. Decomposition estimates of the litter pulse driven by model structures and parameters also varied considerably.Our results support the use of relatively simple soil-only models with low data requirements in inventory type of large-scale carbon assessments. It is important that the modelling processes within the national inventories are transparently reported and special emphasis is put on how the models are used, which assumptions are applied and what is the quality of data used both as input and to calibrate the models. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
000021346 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000021346 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000021346 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aCarbon balance
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aForest
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aModel comparison
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aSoil carbon
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aSimulation model
000021346 65320 $$2Author$$aUncertainty
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFoereid, B.$$b1
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSvensson, M.$$b2
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aShurpali, N.$$b3
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLehtonen, A.$$b4
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129469$$aHerbst, M.$$b5$$uFZJ
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLinkosalo, T.$$b6
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOrtiz, C.$$b7
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTodorovic, G.R.$$b8
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMarcinkonis, S.$$b9
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLi, C.S.$$b10
000021346 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJandl, R.$$b11
000021346 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2027304-6$$a10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.004$$gVol. 35, p. 38 - 49$$p38 - 49$$q35<38 - 49$$tEnvironmental modelling & software$$v35$$x1364-8152$$y2012
000021346 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.02.004
000021346 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:21346$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000021346 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000021346 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000021346 9141_ $$y2012
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000021346 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000021346 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000021346 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)137331
000021346 980__ $$aVDB
000021346 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000021346 980__ $$ajournal
000021346 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000021346 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED