% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rings:21347,
author = {Rings, J. and Vrugt, J.A. and Schoups, G. and Huisman, J.A.
and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{B}ayesian model averaging using particle filtering and
{G}aussian mixture modeling: {T}heory, concepts, and
simulation experiments},
journal = {Water resources research},
volume = {48},
issn = {0043-1397},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {AGU},
reportid = {PreJuSER-21347},
pages = {W05520},
year = {2012},
note = {Jasper A. Vrugt would like to acknowledge financial support
from the LDRD project "Multilevel Adaptive Sampling for
Multiscale Inverse Problems'' of the Los Alamos National
Laboratory.},
abstract = {Bayesian model averaging (BMA) is a standard method for
combining predictive distributions from different models. In
recent years, this method has enjoyed widespread application
and use in many fields of study to improve the spread-skill
relationship of forecast ensembles. The BMA predictive
probability density function (pdf) of any quantity of
interest is a weighted average of pdfs centered around the
individual (possibly bias-corrected) forecasts, where the
weights are equal to posterior probabilities of the models
generating the forecasts, and reflect the individual models
skill over a training (calibration) period. The original BMA
approach presented by Raftery et al. (2005) assumes that the
conditional pdf of each individual model is adequately
described with a rather standard Gaussian or Gamma
statistical distribution, possibly with a heteroscedastic
variance. Here we analyze the advantages of using BMA with a
flexible representation of the conditional pdf. A joint
particle filtering and Gaussian mixture modeling framework
is presented to derive analytically, as closely and
consistently as possible, the evolving forecast density
(conditional pdf) of each constituent ensemble member. The
median forecasts and evolving conditional pdfs of the
constituent models are subsequently combined using BMA to
derive one overall predictive distribution. This paper
introduces the theory and concepts of this new ensemble
postprocessing method, and demonstrates its usefulness and
applicability by numerical simulation of the rainfall-runoff
transformation using discharge data from three different
catchments in the contiguous United States. The revised BMA
method receives significantly lower-prediction errors than
the original default BMA method (due to filtering) with
predictive uncertainty intervals that are substantially
smaller but still statistically coherent (due to the use of
a time-variant conditional pdf).},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Limnology / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000304253000002},
doi = {10.1029/2011WR011607},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21347},
}