000021351 001__ 21351
000021351 005__ 20200702121620.0
000021351 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.051
000021351 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000301326600002
000021351 037__ $$aPreJuSER-21351
000021351 041__ $$aeng
000021351 082__ $$a690
000021351 084__ $$2WoS$$aEngineering, Civil
000021351 084__ $$2WoS$$aGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
000021351 084__ $$2WoS$$aWater Resources
000021351 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aIrvine, D.J.$$b0
000021351 245__ $$aHeterogeneous or homogeneous? Implications of simplifying heterogeneous streambeds in models of losing streams
000021351 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2012
000021351 300__ $$a16 - 23
000021351 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000021351 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000021351 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000021351 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000021351 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000021351 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000021351 440_0 $$03413$$aJournal of Hydrology$$v424$$x0022-1694
000021351 500__ $$3POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
000021351 500__ $$aThis work was funded by the Australian Research Council and the National Water Commission through the National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training and the Swiss National Foundation (PZ00P2_126415). We would like to thank the editor, the associate editor, and the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
000021351 520__ $$aA common approach in modeling surface water-groundwater interaction is to represent the streambed as a homogeneous geological structure with hydraulic properties obtained by means of model calibration. In reality, streambeds are highly heterogeneous, and there are currently no methodical investigations to justify the simplification of this geologic complexity. Using a physically based numerical model, synthetic surface water-groundwater infiltration flux data were generated using heterogeneous streambeds for losing connected, losing transitional and losing disconnected streams. Homogeneous streambed hydraulic conductivities were calibrated to reproduce these fluxes. The homogeneous equivalents were used for predicting infiltration fluxes between streams and the aquifer under different hydrological conditions (i.e. for different states of connection). Homogeneous equivalents are shown to only accurately reproduce infiltration fluxes if both the calibration and prediction are made for a connected flow regime, or if both the calibration and prediction are made for a disconnected flow regime. The greatest errors in flux (+/- 34%) using homogeneous equivalents occurred when there was a mismatch between the flow regime of the observation data and the prediction. These errors are comparatively small when compared with field measurement errors for hydraulic conductivity, however over long river reaches these errors can amount to significant volumes of water. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
000021351 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aTerrestrische Umwelt$$cP24$$x0
000021351 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aGroundwater/surface water interaction
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aStreambed heterogeneity
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aLosing streams
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aDisconnection
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aNumerical modeling
000021351 65320 $$2Author$$aInverse modeling
000021351 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000021351 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBrunner, P.$$b1
000021351 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)138662$$aHendricks-Franssen, H.J.$$b2$$uFZJ
000021351 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSimmons, C.T.$$b3
000021351 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473173-3$$a10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.051$$gVol. 424-425, p. 16 - 23$$p16 - 23$$q424-425<16 - 23$$tJournal of hydrology$$v424-425$$x0022-1694$$y2012
000021351 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.051
000021351 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:21351$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000021351 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
000021351 9141_ $$y2012
000021351 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$kP24$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000021351 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vAddenda$$x0
000021351 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$gIBG$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000021351 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)137337
000021351 980__ $$aVDB
000021351 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000021351 980__ $$ajournal
000021351 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000021351 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED