% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bechtold:21587,
author = {Bechtold, M. and Vanderborght, J. and Weihermüller, L. and
Herbst, M. and Günther, T. and Ippisch, O. and Kasteel, R.
and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{U}pward transport in a three-dimensional heterogeneous
laboratory soil under evaporation conditions},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-21587},
year = {2012},
note = {This study was funded by the network EOS
(www.netzwerk-eos.dlr.de). We are grateful for the help of
Robert Schroder, Odilia Esser, Anke Langen, and many more
during the construction of the experimental setup. We thank
Mathieu Javaux for providing the MATLAB library for
convection-dispersion analytical solutions (CASlib),
Johannes Koestel for making his MATLAB code for the ERT
error estimation available, and Horst Hardelauf for support
in coupling PARTRACE with the finite-volume flow model. We
thank Niklas Linde for several useful comments.},
abstract = {Upward water flow induced by evaporation can cause soil
salinization and transport of contaminants to the soil
surface and influences the migration of solutes to the
groundwater. In this study, we used electrical resistivity
tomography (ERT) to obtain time-lapse images of an
upward-flow tracer experiment under evaporation conditions
in a three-dimensional, spatially correlated heterogeneous
laboratory soil composed of three different materials
(coarse-, medium-, and fine-grained sands). The tracer
experiment was performed during 40 d of quasi-steady-state,
upward-flow conditions. Monitored transport was compared
with three-dimensional numerical simulation based on the
Richards and advection-dispersion equations. The ERT-derived
and modeled solute transport correlated well in the lower
part of the laboratory soil, while deviations increased
toward the surface. Inversion of synthetic ERT data
indicated that deviations cannot be explained by ERT data
and inversion errors only, but also errors of the flow and
transport model must be invoked. The classical
potential/actual evaporation (E-pot/E-a) concept
underestimated the experimental evaporation, as locally E-a
exceeded E-pot, which was determined as the maximum
evaporation from an insulated free water table minus soil
heat flux. Increasing the potential evaporation rate
uniformly in the model, so that wet high-evaporation zones
can compensate for lower evaporation from dry zones,
increased the correlation between experiment and model.
Despite the remaining deviations, experiment and model
showed a consistent and systematic pattern of preferential
upward transport pathways. Close above the water table, most
of the transport occurred in the coarse material, while with
increasing height, transport was dominated by the finer
materials. This study is an experimental benchmark for
three-dimensional flow and transport models using simplified
evaporation boundary conditions and for ERT to monitor
upward transport.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Soil Science / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000306830700005},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2011.0066},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/21587},
}