% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Plger:22110,
      author       = {Plöger, F. and Konopka, P. and Müller, R. and Günther,
                      G. and Grooss, J.-U. and Schiller, C. and Ravegnani, F. and
                      Ulanovski, A. and Riese, M.},
      title        = {{B}acktrajectory reconstruction of water vapour and ozone
                      in-situ observations in the {TTL}},
      journal      = {Meteorologische Zeitschrift},
      volume       = {21},
      issn         = {0941-2948},
      address      = {Stuttgart},
      publisher    = {E. Schweizerbart Science Publishers},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-22110},
      pages        = {239 - 244},
      year         = {2012},
      note         = {We thank the ECMWF for providing the reanalysis data, COST
                      for funding a Short Term Scientific Mission for F. PLOEGER,
                      and in particular N. THOMAS for programming support.},
      abstract     = {Water vapour and ozone in-situ observations in the tropical
                      tropopause layer (TTL) during the three tropical campaigns
                      SCOUT-O3, AMMA and TroCCiNOx are reconstructed from diabatic
                      and kinematic backtrajectories, with the reconstruction
                      method for the tracer fields based on freeze-drying and
                      photochemichal ozone production. The results using diabatic
                      trajectories show that both water vapour and ozone in-situ
                      observations can be well reconstructed from trajectories.
                      Consequentially, in-situ observations agree with the
                      assumption of freeze-drying due to the large-scale
                      temperature field as the main control mechanism for water
                      vapour and photochemical production and transport as main
                      control mechanisms for tropical ozone. The kinematic ozone
                      reconstruction, however, shows a large high-bias during
                      SCOUT-O3 and a too strong variability during all campaigns,
                      due to excessive transport of stratospheric ozone into the
                      TTL. We conclude that kinematic reconstructions of in-situ
                      observations are less reliable than diabatic, due to
                      unrealistic inhomogeneities in the velocity field.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {IEK-7},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013},
      pnm          = {Atmosphäre und Klima},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK491},
      shelfmark    = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000306436800004},
      doi          = {10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0314},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/22110},
}