% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Bauser:22328,
author = {Bauser, G. and Hendricks-Franssen, H.J. and Stauffer, F.
and Kaiser, H.P. and Kuhlmann, U. and Kinzelbach, W.},
title = {{A} comparison study of two different control criteria for
the real-time management of urban groundwater works},
journal = {Journal of environmental management},
volume = {105},
issn = {0301-4797},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {PreJuSER-22328},
pages = {21 - 29},
year = {2012},
note = {The study was performed within the project "Real-time
control of a well-field using a groundwater model", a
cooperation between ETH Zurich, Zurich Water Supply and TK
Consult Zurich. This project was funded by the Swiss
Innovation Promotion Agency CTI under Contract No. 7608.2
EPRP-IW. The author gratefully acknowledges the doctoral
scholarship granted by the German National Academic
Foundation.},
abstract = {We present the comparison of two control criteria for the
real-time management of a water well field. The criteria
were used to simulate the operation of the Hardhof well
field in the city of Zurich, Switzerland. This well field is
threatened by diffuse pollution in the subsurface of the
surrounding city area. The risk of attracting pollutants is
higher if the pumping rates in four horizontal wells are
increased, and can be reduced by increasing artificial
recharge in several recharge basins and infiltration wells
or by modifying the artificial recharge distribution. A
three-dimensional finite elements flow model was built for
the Hardhof site. The first control criterion used hydraulic
head differences (Δh-criterion) to control the management
of the well field and the second criterion used a path line
method $(\%s-criterion)$ to control the percentage of
inflowing water from the city area. Both control methods
adapt the allocation of artificial recharge (AR) for given
pumping rates in time. The simulation results show that (1)
historical management decisions were less effective compared
to the optimal control according to the two different
criteria and (2) the distribution of artificial recharge
calculated with the two control criteria also differ from
each other with the $\%s-criterion$ giving better results
compared to the Δh-criterion. The recharge management with
the $\%s-criterion$ requires a smaller amount of water to be
recharged. The ratio between average artificial recharge and
average abstraction is 1.7 for the Δh-criterion and 1.5 for
the $\%s-criterion.$ Both criteria were tested online. The
methodologies were extended to a real-time control method
using the Ensemble Kalman Filter method for assimilating 87
online available groundwater head measurements to update the
model in real-time. The results of the operational
implementation are also satisfying in regard of a reduced
risk of well contamination.},
keywords = {Cities / Fuzzy Logic / Groundwater: chemistry / Rivers /
Switzerland / Water Pollutants, Chemical: chemistry / Water
Pollution: analysis / Water Supply: analysis / Water
Pollutants, Chemical (NLM Chemicals) / J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Environmental Studies},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:22516870},
UT = {WOS:000305204900003},
doi = {10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.024},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/22328},
}