% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Caspers:22405,
author = {Caspers, S. and Heim, S. and Lucas, M.G. and Stephan, E.
and Fischer, L. and Amunts, K. and Zilles, K.},
title = {{D}issociated {N}eural {P}rocessing for {D}ecisions in
{M}anagers and {N}on-{M}anagers},
journal = {PLoS one},
volume = {7},
number = {8},
issn = {1932-6203},
address = {Lawrence, Kan.},
publisher = {PLoS},
reportid = {PreJuSER-22405},
pages = {e43537},
year = {2012},
note = {This work was supported by the Initiative and Networking
Fund of the Helmholtz Association within the Helmholtz
Alliance on Systems Biology (Human Brain Model, K.Z.), the
Helmholtz Alliance for Mental Health in an Aging Society
(K.Z., K. A.), and a grant of the German Federal Ministry of
Education and Research (No. 01GW0613; K. A.). The funders
had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.},
abstract = {Functional neuroimaging studies of decision-making so far
mainly focused on decisions under uncertainty or negotiation
with other persons. Dual process theory assumes that, in
such situations, decision making relies on either a rapid
intuitive, automated or a slower rational processing system.
However, it still remains elusive how personality factors or
professional requirements might modulate the decision
process and the underlying neural mechanisms. Since decision
making is a key task of managers, we hypothesized that
managers, facing higher pressure for frequent and rapid
decisions than non-managers, prefer the heuristic, automated
decision strategy in contrast to non-managers. Such
different strategies may, in turn, rely on different neural
systems. We tested managers and non-managers in a functional
magnetic resonance imaging study using a forced-choice
paradigm on word-pairs. Managers showed subcortical
activation in the head of the caudate nucleus, and reduced
hemodynamic response within the cortex. In contrast,
non-managers revealed the opposite pattern. With the head of
the caudate nucleus being an initiating component for
process automation, these results supported the initial
hypothesis, hinting at automation during decisions in
managers. More generally, the findings reveal how different
professional requirements might modulate cognitive decision
processing.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {INM-1 / INM-2},
ddc = {500},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
pnm = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571},
shelfmark = {Biology},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:22927984},
pmc = {pmc:PMC3425477},
UT = {WOS:000308286300064},
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0043537},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/22405},
}