000024728 001__ 24728
000024728 005__ 20240712100821.0
000024728 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2001JD000482
000024728 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000180371300001
000024728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-1406
000024728 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0148-0227
000024728 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20883
000024728 037__ $$aPreJuSER-24728
000024728 041__ $$aeng
000024728 082__ $$a550
000024728 082__ $$a550
000024728 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000024728 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHarris, R. J.$$b0
000024728 245__ $$aComparison of empirically derived ozone loss rates in the Arctic vortex
000024728 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$bUnion$$c2002
000024728 300__ $$aD20
000024728 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000024728 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000024728 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000024728 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000024728 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000024728 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000024728 440_0 $$03369$$aJournal of Geophysical Research$$v107$$x0022-1406
000024728 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000024728 520__ $$aA number of studies have reported empirical estimates of ozone loss in the Arctic vortex. They have used satellite and in situ measurements and have principally covered the Arctic winters in the 1990s. While there is qualitative consistency between the patterns of ozone loss, a quantitative comparison of the published values shows apparent disagreements. In this paper we examine these disagreements in more detail. We choose to concentrate on the five main techniques (Match, Systeme d'Analyse par Observation Zenithale (SAOZ)/REPROBUS, Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), vortex average descent, and the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) ozone tracer approach). Estimates of the ozone losses in three winters (1994/1995, 1995/1996 and 1996/1997) are recalculated so that the same time periods, altitude ranges, and definitions of the Arctic vortex are used. This recalculation reveals a remarkably good agreement between the various estimates. For example, a superficial comparison of results from Match and from MLS indicates a big discrepancy (2.0+/-0.3 and 0.85 ppmv, respectively, for air ending at similar to460 K in March 1995). However, the more precise comparisons presented here reveal good agreement for the individual MLS periods (0.5+/-0.1 versus 0.5 ppmv; 0.4+/-0.2 versus 0.3-0.4 ppmv; and 0.16+/-0.09 ppmv versus no significant loss). Initial comparisons of the column losses derived for 1999/2000 also show good agreement with four techniques, giving 105 DU (SAOZ/REPROBUS), 80 DU (380-700 K partial column from Polar Ozone and Aerosol Monitoring (POAM)/REPROBUS), 85+/-10 DU (HALOE ozone tracer), and 88+/-13 (400-580 partial column from Match). There are some remaining discrepancies with ozone losses calculated using HALOE ozone tracer relations; it is important to ensure that the initial relation is truly representative of the vortex prior to the period of ozone loss.
000024728 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000024728 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000024728 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$aozone
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$astratosphere
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$aArctic
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$achemical loss
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$aestimate
000024728 65320 $$2Author$$acomparison
000024728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRex, M.$$b1
000024728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKnudsen, B. M.$$b2
000024728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aManney, G. L.$$b3
000024728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aMüller, R.$$b4$$uFZJ
000024728 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$avon der Gathen, P.$$b5
000024728 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7$$a10.1029/2001JD000482$$gVol. 107, p. D20$$pD20$$q107<D20$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres$$v107$$x0022-1406$$y2002
000024728 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000482
000024728 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/24728/files/2001JD000482.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000024728 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/24728/files/2001JD000482.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000024728 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:24728$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000024728 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000024728 9141_ $$y2002
000024728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000024728 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000024728 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-I$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000024728 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)16148
000024728 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000024728 980__ $$aVDB
000024728 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000024728 980__ $$ajournal
000024728 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000024728 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000024728 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013
000024728 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013