000025235 001__ 25235
000025235 005__ 20240712101005.0
000025235 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2002GL014660
000025235 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000178964100010
000025235 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20831
000025235 037__ $$aPreJuSER-25235
000025235 041__ $$aeng
000025235 082__ $$a550
000025235 084__ $$2WoS$$aGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
000025235 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCrowther, R. A.$$b0
000025235 245__ $$aCharacterising the effect of large-scale model resolution upon calculated OH production using MOZAIC data
000025235 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bAmerican Geophysical Union$$c2002
000025235 300__ $$a
000025235 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000025235 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000025235 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000025235 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000025235 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000025235 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000025235 440_0 $$02249$$aGeophysical Research Letters$$v29$$x0094-8276
000025235 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000025235 520__ $$a[1] The coarse spatial resolution of large-scale models can be a significant source of error in calculating grid cell averaged rates of physical processes. We investigate here the influence of resolution in the case of chemical reactions. We use high resolution MOZAIC ozone and water vapour data to characterise the effects of unresolved structures on model-calculated production of the hydroxyl radical (OH) in the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere region. The statistical analysis of MOZAIC data indicates that, on average, large-scale models may overestimate OH production by 5% to 20% for resolutions ranging from 200 to 800 km respectively. This systematic bias is found to be most significant in the tropopause region.
000025235 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000025235 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000025235 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000025235 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLaw, K. S.$$b1
000025235 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPyle, J. A.$$b2
000025235 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBekki, S.$$b3
000025235 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16203$$aSmit, H. G. J.$$b4$$uFZJ
000025235 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2021599-X$$a10.1029/2002GL014660$$gVol. 29$$q29$$tGeophysical research letters$$v29$$x0094-8276$$y2002
000025235 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GL014660
000025235 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/25235/files/2002GL014660.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000025235 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/25235/files/2002GL014660.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000025235 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:25235$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000025235 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000025235 9141_ $$y2002
000025235 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000025235 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000025235 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000025235 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)16409
000025235 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000025235 980__ $$aVDB
000025235 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000025235 980__ $$ajournal
000025235 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000025235 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000025235 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000025235 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013