000255949 001__ 255949
000255949 005__ 20210129220558.0
000255949 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10661-015-4837-3
000255949 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0167-6369
000255949 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-2959
000255949 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000362284700015
000255949 037__ $$aFZJ-2015-06028
000255949 041__ $$aEnglish
000255949 082__ $$a333.7
000255949 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDutta, Anirban$$b0
000255949 245__ $$aEffect of organic carbon chemistry on sorption of atrazine and metsulfuron-methyl as determined by $^{13}$C-NMR and IR spectroscopy
000255949 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2015
000255949 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1445437726_1447
000255949 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000255949 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000255949 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000255949 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000255949 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000255949 520__ $$aSoil organic matter (SOM) content is themajor soil component affecting pesticide sorption. However,recent studies have highlighted the fact that it is notthe total carbon content of the organic matter, but itschemical structure which have a profound effect on thepesticide’s sorption. In the present study, sorption ofatrazine and metsulfuron-methyl herbicides was studiedin four SOM fractions viz. commercial humic acid,commercial lignin, as well as humic acid and huminextracted from a compost. Sorption data was fitted to theFreundlich adsorption equation. In general, theFreundlich slope (1/n) values for both the herbicideswere <1. Except for atrazine sorption on commercialhumic acid, metsulfuron-methyl was more sorbed. Desorptionresults suggested that atrazine was moredesorbed than metsulfuron-methyl. Lignin, whichshowed least sorption of both the herbicides, showedminimum desorption. Sorption of atrazine was bestpositively correlated with the alkyl carbon (adjustedR2 = 0.748) and carbonyl carbon (adjusted R2 = 0.498)but, their effect was statistically nonsignificant(P = 0.05). Metsulfuron-methyl sorption showed bestpositive correlation with carbonyl carbon (adjustedR2 = 0.960; P = 0.05) content. Sorption of both theherbicides showed negative correlation with O/N-alkylcarbon. Correlation of herbicide’s sorption with alkyland carbonyl carbon content of SOM fractions suggestedtheir contribution towards herbicide sorption.But, sorption of metsulfuron-methyl, relatively morepolar than atrazine, was mainly governed by the polargroups in SOM. IR spectra showed that H-bonds andcharge-transfer bonds between SOM fraction and herbicidesprobably operated as mechanisms of adsorption.
000255949 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000255949 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000255949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMandal, Abhishek$$b1
000255949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aManna, Suman$$b2
000255949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSingh, S. B.$$b3
000255949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129438$$aBerns, Anne E.$$b4$$ufzj
000255949 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSingh, Neera$$b5$$eCorresponding author
000255949 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2012242-1$$a10.1007/s10661-015-4837-3$$gVol. 187, no. 10, p. 620$$n10$$p620$$tEnvironmental monitoring and assessment$$v187$$x1573-2959$$y2015
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.pdf$$yRestricted
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000255949 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/255949/files/art_10.1007_s10661-015-4837-3.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000255949 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:255949$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bENVIRON MONIT ASSESS : 2014
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000255949 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000255949 9141_ $$y2015
000255949 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129438$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000255949 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000255949 920__ $$lyes
000255949 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000255949 980__ $$ajournal
000255949 980__ $$aVDB
000255949 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000255949 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED