% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ehlers:279649,
author = {Ehlers, L. and Herrmann, F. and Blaschek, M. and Duttmann,
R. and Wendland, F.},
title = {{S}ensitivity of m{GROWA}-simulated groundwater recharge to
changes in soil and land use parameters in a {M}editerranean
environment and conclusions in view of ensemble-based
climate impact simulations},
journal = {The science of the total environment},
volume = {543},
issn = {0048-9697},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-07531},
pages = {937 - 951},
year = {2016},
abstract = {This study examines the impact of changing climatic
conditions on groundwater recharge in the Riu Mannu
catchment in southern Sardinia. Based on an ensemble of four
downscaled and bias corrected combinations of Global and
Regional Climate Models (GCM–RCMs), the deterministic
distributed water balance model mGROWA was used to simulate
long-term mean annual groundwater recharge in the catchment
for four 30-year periods between 1981 and 2100. The four
employed GCM–RCM combinations project an adverse climatic
development for the study area: by the period 2071–2100,
annual rainfall will decrease considerably, while grass
reference evapotranspiration will rise. Accordingly,
ensemble results for our base scenario showed a
climate-induced decrease in the median of annual groundwater
recharge in areas covered by Macchia from 42–48 mm/a to
25–35 mm/a between the periods 1981–2010 and
2071–2100, corresponding to a reduction of $17–43\%.$ To
take into account the influence of additional plant
available water storage in weathered bedrock on groundwater
recharge generation, the model was extended by a regolith
zone for regions covered by Mediterranean Macchia. In a set
of model runs (“scenarios”), parameter values
controlling the water storage capacity of this zone were
increased step-wise and evaluated by comparison to the base
scenario to analyze the sensitivity of the model outcome to
these changes. The implementation of a regolith zone had a
considerable impact on groundwater recharge and resulted in
a decrease of the median in annual groundwater recharge: by
2071–2100, the $35\%$ scenario (available water content in
the regolith of 3.9 to 5.7 $vol.\%)$ showed a reduction of
$67–82\%$ as compared to the period 1981–2010 in the
base scenario. In addition, we also examined the influence
of changes in the crop coefficients (Kc) as well as
different soil texture distributions on simulated
groundwater recharge.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {333.7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000367638000008},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.122},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/279649},
}