% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Orgs:280488,
      author       = {Orgs, Guido and Dovern, Anna and Hagura, Nobuhiro and
                      Haggard, Patrick and Fink, Gereon R. and Weiss, Peter H.},
      title        = {{C}onstructing {V}isual {P}erception of {B}ody {M}ovement
                      with the {M}otor {C}ortex},
      journal      = {Cerebral cortex},
      volume       = {26},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {1460-2199},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2016-00258},
      pages        = {440 - 449},
      year         = {2016},
      abstract     = {The human brain readily perceives fluent movement from
                      static input. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging,
                      we investigated brain mechanisms that mediate fluent
                      apparent biological motion (ABM) perception from sequences
                      of body postures. We presented body and nonbody stimuli
                      varying in objective sequence duration and fluency of
                      apparent movement. Three body postures were ordered to
                      produce a fluent (ABC) or a nonfluent (ACB) apparent
                      movement. This enabled us to identify brain areas involved
                      in the perceptual reconstruction of body movement from
                      identical lower-level static input. Participants judged the
                      duration of a rectangle containing body/nonbody sequences,
                      as an implicit measure of movement fluency. For body
                      stimuli, fluent apparent motion sequences produced
                      subjectively longer durations than nonfluent sequences of
                      the same objective duration. This difference was reduced for
                      nonbody stimuli. This body-specific bias in duration
                      perception was associated with increased blood oxygen
                      level-dependent responses in the primary (M1) and
                      supplementary motor areas. Moreover, fluent ABM was
                      associated with increased functional connectivity between
                      M1/SMA and right fusiform body area. We show that perceptual
                      reconstruction of fluent movement from static body postures
                      does not merely enlist areas traditionally associated with
                      visual body processing, but involves cooperative recruitment
                      of motor areas, consistent with a “motor way of
                      seeing”.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000370972500039},
      pubmed       = {pmid:26534907},
      doi          = {10.1093/cercor/bhv262},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280488},
}