% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Marienfeld:28049,
author = {Marienfeld, S. and Schmohl, N. and Klein, M. and Schröder,
W. H. and Kuhn, A. J. and Horst, W. J.},
title = {{L}ocalisation of aluminium in root tips of {Z}ea mays and
{V}icia faba},
journal = {Journal of plant physiology},
volume = {156},
issn = {0176-1617},
address = {München},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {PreJuSER-28049},
pages = {666 - 671},
year = {2000},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Monocot species and dicot species differ widely in the
composition of their cell walls, namely in the pectin
content, and thus in potential At-binding sires. The effect
of these differences on cellular localisation as well as on
tissue distribution of Al was compared in root tips of Zea
mays and Vicia faba. The localisation of Al was assayed by
Laser Microprobe Mass Analysis (LAMMA) after
freeze-substitution. The radial mobility of Al was much
lower in the roots of Vicia faba. In root tips of Zen mays,
Al had reached the stele already after 60 min while it was
confined to the rhizodermis and outer cortex cells in Vicia
faba, indicating a stronger binding of Al in the cell walls
of the dicot. This binding, however, had no influence on
intracellular distribution. Within 60 min intracellular Al
was detectable in both species. Nevertheless, by far the
highest Al concentrations were always measured in the cell
wall.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBI},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB281},
pnm = {Zelluläre Signalverarbeitung},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK95},
shelfmark = {Plant Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000087980200014},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/28049},
}