000280605 001__ 280605
000280605 005__ 20210129221350.0
000280605 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.mri.2007.01.105
000280605 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0730-725X
000280605 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-5894
000280605 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-00373
000280605 041__ $$aEnglish
000280605 082__ $$a610
000280605 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVan As, H.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000280605 245__ $$aFlow MRI teaches us some lessons on hydraulic conductivity in trees
000280605 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2007
000280605 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1452756983_10296
000280605 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000280605 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000280605 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000280605 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000280605 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000280605 520__ $$aHydraulic conductivity of long-distance xylem and phloem transport in plants and trees is key information to validate biophysical structure-function plant models. Such models are in use to address water stress-induced effects and growth limitations. In addition, such models are used to quantify the contribution of plant evapotranspiration and carbon exchange within global atmospheric circulation models [1]. In xylem and phloem, the effective flow conducting area and the resistance within the vessel or tracheid connections determine hydraulics. Using conventional methods, it is very difficult to determine the active flow conducting area and to study the dynamics (e.g., day–night, stress responses) therein.A very promising and attractive method for providing detailed quantitative information on effective flow-conducting area in intact plants is flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based on PFG methods. Because the diameter of flow-conducting vessels and tracheids are small in comparison to the pixel size, a crucial step in quantification of the flow and effective flow conducting area is to discriminate stationary and flowing water within a single pixel. The fact that the propagator for stationary water is symmetrical around zero is used to separate the stationary from the flowing water. The signal in the nonflow direction is mirrored around zero displacement and subtracted from the signal in the flow direction to produce the displacement distribution of the flowing and the stationary water. Using this approach, for each pixel in the image, the following flow characteristics are extracted in a model-free fashion: total amount of water, amount of stationary water, amount of flowing water (or flow conducting area), average velocity (including the direction of flow) and volume flow per pixel. A propagator flow imaging method was developed that allowed the flow profile of every pixel in an image to be recorded quantitatively, with a relatively high spatial resolution, while keeping measurement times down to 15–30 minutes [2].Phloem transport in plants is particularly difficult to measure quantitatively. The slow flow velocities and the very small flowing volumes in the presence of large amounts of stationary water make it difficult to distinguish the slowly flowing phloem sap from freely diffusing water. We have optimized the MRI hardware (3-T vertical-bore, intact-plant MRI) and the propagator-fast imaging method to quantitatively measure, for the first time, detailed flow profiles of phloem flow in large and fully developed plants, including trees [3]. In this way, the dynamics in phloem and xylem flow and flow conducting area are studied. The observed differences for day and night in flow-conducting area, which directly relate to xylem and phloem hydraulics, are one of the most striking observations, which demonstrates the potential of the method to study hydraulics in intact plants under normal and stress conditions.Here, we discuss the accuracy of the method to determine the effective flow-conducting area and present results of dynamics in effective flow-conductive area under different conditions. Some striking lessons emerge from the results, which demonstrate that trees are dynamic, unsaturated porous media.
000280605 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)$$cPOF3-899$$fPOF III$$x0
000280605 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000280605 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129422$$aWindt, Carel$$b1$$ufzj
000280605 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHoman, N.$$b2
000280605 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGerkema, E.$$b3
000280605 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVergeldt, F. J.$$b4
000280605 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1500646-3$$a10.1016/j.mri.2007.01.105$$gVol. 25, no. 4, p. 586 - 587$$n4$$p586 - 587$$tMagnetic resonance imaging$$v25$$x0730-725X$$y2007
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000280605 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280605/files/1-s2.0-S0730725X07001257-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000280605 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:280605$$pVDB
000280605 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129422$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000280605 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bMAGN RESON IMAGING : 2014
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000280605 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000280605 920__ $$lyes
000280605 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000280605 980__ $$ajournal
000280605 980__ $$aVDB
000280605 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000280605 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118