Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > MRI of long-distance water transport: a comparison of the phloem and xylem flow characteristics and dynamics in poplar, castor bean, tomato and tobacco > print

001     280606
005     20210129221350.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01544.x
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0140-7791
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1365-3040
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000239370700004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-00374
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Windt, Carel
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129422
|b 0
245 _ _ |a MRI of long-distance water transport: a comparison of the phloem and xylem flow characteristics and dynamics in poplar, castor bean, tomato and tobacco
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|c 2006
|b Wiley-Blackwell
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1452757122_10302
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a We used dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) equipment and methods to study phloem and xylem transport in large potted plants. Quantitative flow profiles were obtained on a per-pixel basis, giving parameter maps of velocity, flow-conducting area and volume flow (flux). The diurnal xylem and phloem flow dynamics in poplar, castor bean, tomato and tobacco were compared. In poplar, clear diurnal differences in phloem flow profile were found, but phloem flux remained constant. In tomato, only small diurnal differences in flow profile were observed. In castor bean and tobacco, phloem flow remained unchanged. In all plants, xylem flow profiles showed large diurnal variation. Decreases in xylem flux were accompanied by a decrease in velocity and flow-conducting area. The diurnal changes in flow-conducting area of phloem and xylem could not be explained by pressure-dependent elastic changes in conduit diameter. The phloem to xylem flux ratio reflects what fraction of xylem water is used for phloem transport (Munch's counterflow). This ratio was large at night for poplar (0.19), castor bean (0.37) and tobacco (0.55), but low in tomato (0.04). The differences in phloem flow velocity between the four species, as well as within a diurnal cycle, were remarkably small (0.25-0.40 mm s(-1)). We hypothesize that upper and lower bounds for phloem flow velocity may exist: when phloem flow velocity is too high, parietal organelles may be stripped away from sieve tube walls; when sap flow is too slow or is highly variable, phloem-borne signalling could become unpredictable.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a VERGELDT, FRANK J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a DE JAGER, P. ADRIE
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a VAN AS, HENK
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01544.x
|g Vol. 29, no. 9, p. 1715 - 1729
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2020843-1
|n 9
|p 1715 - 1729
|t Plant, cell & environment
|v 29
|y 2006
|x 1365-3040
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280606/files/WINDT_et_al-2006-Plant%2C_Cell_%26_Environment.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:280606
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129422
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b PLANT CELL ENVIRON : 2014
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b PLANT CELL ENVIRON : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a No Authors Fulltext
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0550
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21