000280667 001__ 280667
000280667 005__ 20240625095111.0
000280667 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0135998
000280667 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/14208
000280667 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000359664300031
000280667 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:4405337
000280667 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:26280453
000280667 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-00424
000280667 041__ $$aEnglish
000280667 082__ $$a500
000280667 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCong, Xiaojing$$b0
000280667 245__ $$aStructural Determinants for the Binding of Morphinan Agonists to the μ-Opioid Receptor
000280667 260__ $$aLawrence, Kan.$$bPLoS$$c2015
000280667 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000280667 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000280667 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1492605599_12592
000280667 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000280667 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000280667 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000280667 520__ $$aAtomistic descriptions of the μ-opioid receptor (μOR) noncovalently binding with two of its prototypical morphinan agonists, morphine (MOP) and hydromorphone (HMP), are investigated using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Subtle differences between the binding modes and hydration properties of MOP and HMP emerge from the calculations. Alchemical free energy perturbation calculations show qualitative agreement with in vitro experiments performed in this work: indeed, the binding free energy difference between MOP and HMP computed by forward and backward alchemical transformation is 1.2±1.1 and 0.8±0.8 kcal/mol, respectively, to be compared with 0.4±0.3 kcal/mol from experiment. Comparison with an MD simulation of μOR covalently bound with the antagonist β-funaltrexamine hints to agonist-induced conformational changes associated with an early event of the receptor’s activation: a shift of the transmembrane helix 6 relative to the transmembrane helix 3 and a consequent loss of the key R165-T279 interhelical hydrogen bond. This finding is consistent with a previous proposal suggesting that the R165-T279 hydrogen bond between these two helices indicates an inactive receptor conformation.
000280667 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)$$cPOF3-899$$fPOF III$$x0
000280667 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166186$$aCampomanes, Pablo$$b1
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKless, Achim$$b2
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchapitz, Inga$$b3
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWagener, Markus$$b4
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKoch, Thomas$$b5
000280667 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145614$$aCarloni, Paolo$$b6$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000280667 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2267670-3$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0135998$$gVol. 10, no. 8, p. e0135998 -$$n8$$pe0135998 -$$tPLoS one$$v10$$x1932-6203$$y2015
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/280667/files/journal.pone.0135998.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000280667 8767_ $$92015-05-08$$d2015-08-31$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zUSD 1350,-
000280667 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:280667$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000280667 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145614$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b6$$kFZJ
000280667 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000280667 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPLOS ONE : 2014
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000280667 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000280667 920__ $$lyes
000280667 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)GRS-20100316$$kGRS Jülich ; German Research School for Simulation Sciences$$lGRS$$x0
000280667 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330$$kIAS-5$$lComputational Biomedicine$$x1
000280667 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121$$kINM-9$$lComputational Biomedicine$$x2
000280667 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000280667 980__ $$ajournal
000280667 980__ $$aVDB
000280667 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000280667 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)GRS-20100316
000280667 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330
000280667 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121
000280667 980__ $$aAPC
000280667 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IAS-5-20120330
000280667 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-9-20140121