000281020 001__ 281020
000281020 005__ 20220930130056.0
000281020 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1162/jocn_a_00890
000281020 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0898-929X
000281020 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1530-8898
000281020 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000367450100003
000281020 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-00731
000281020 041__ $$aEnglish
000281020 082__ $$a400
000281020 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131718$$aDovern, Anna$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000281020 245__ $$aTiming Matters? Learning of Complex Spatiotemporal Sequences in Left-hemisphere Stroke Patients
000281020 260__ $$aCambridge, Mass.$$bMIT Pr. Journals$$c2016
000281020 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1453705908_6239
000281020 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000281020 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000281020 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000281020 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000281020 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000281020 520__ $$aDuring rehabilitation after stroke motor sequence learning is of particular importance because considerable effort is devoted to (re)acquiring lost motor skills. Previous studies suggest that implicit motor sequence learning is preserved in stroke patients but were restricted to the spatial dimension, although the timing of single action components is as important as their spatial order. As the left parietal cortex is known to play a critical role in implicit timing and spatiotemporal integration, in this study we applied an adapted version of the SRT task designed to assess both spatial (different stimulus locations) and temporal (different response–stimulus intervals) aspects of motor learning to 24 right-handed patients with a single left-hemisphere (LH) stroke and 24 age-matched healthy controls. Implicit retrieval of sequence knowledge was tested both at Day 1 and after 24 hr (Day 2). Additionally, voxel-based lesion symptom mapping was used to investigate the neurobiological substrates of the behavioral effects. Although LH stroke patients showed a combined spatiotemporal learning effect that was comparable to that observed in controls, LH stroke patients did not show learning effects for the learning probes in which only one type of sequence information was maintained whereas the other one was randomized. Particularly on Day 2, patients showed significantly smaller learning scores for these two learning probes than controls. Voxel-based lesion symptom mapping analyses revealed for all learning probes that diminished learning scores on Day 2 were associated with lesions of the striatum. This might be attributed to its role in motor chunking and offline consolidation as group differences occurred on Day 2 only. The current results suggest that LH stroke patients rely on multimodal information (here: temporal and spatial information) when retrieving motor sequence knowledge and are very sensitive to any disruption of the learnt sequence information as they seem to build very rigid chunks preventing them from forming independent spatial and temporal sequence representations.
000281020 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000281020 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b1$$ufzj
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145382$$aTimpert, David C.$$b2
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSaliger, Jochen$$b3
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKarbe, Hans$$b4
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWeiss, Peter H.$$b5
000281020 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKoch, Iring$$b6
000281020 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1475255-4$$a10.1162/jocn_a_00890$$gVol. 28, no. 2, p. 223 - 236$$n2$$p223 - 236$$tJournal of cognitive neuroscience$$v28$$x1530-8898$$y2016
000281020 8767_ $$92015-11-23$$d2015-12-01$$ePage charges$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zUSD 865,-
000281020 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:281020$$pOpenAPC$$pVDB$$popenCost
000281020 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131718$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000281020 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000281020 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-HGF)0$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b5$$kFZJ
000281020 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000281020 9141_ $$y2016
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ COGNITIVE NEUROSCI : 2014
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000281020 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000281020 920__ $$lyes
000281020 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000281020 980__ $$ajournal
000281020 980__ $$aVDB
000281020 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000281020 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000281020 980__ $$aAPC