% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Lievens:281469,
author = {Lievens, H. and Tomer, S. K. and Al Bitar, A. and De
Lannoy, G. J. M. and Drusch, M. and Dumedah, G. and
Hendricks-Franssen, Harrie-Jan and Kerr, Y. H. and Martens,
B. and Pan, M. and Roundy, J. K. and Vereecken, Harry and
Walker, J. P. and Wood, E. F. and Verhoest, N. E. C. and
Pauwels, V. R. N.},
title = {{SMOS} soil moisture assimilation for improved hydrologic
simulation in the {M}urray {D}arling {B}asin, {A}ustralia},
journal = {Remote sensing of environment},
volume = {168},
issn = {0034-4257},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2016-01162},
pages = {146 - 162},
year = {2015},
abstract = {This study explores the benefits of assimilating SMOS soil
moisture retrievals for hydrologic modeling, with a focus on
soil moisture and streamflow simulations in the Murray
Darling Basin, Australia. In this basin, floods occur
relatively frequently and initial catchment storage is known
to be key to runoff generation. The land surface model is
the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) model. The model is
calibrated using the available streamflow records of 169
gauge stations across the Murray Darling Basin. The VIC soil
moisture forecast is sequentially updated with observations
from the SMOS Level 3 CATDS (Centre Aval de Traitement des
Données SMOS) soil moisture product using the Ensemble
Kalman filter. The assimilation algorithm accounts for the
spatial mismatch between the model (0.125°) and the SMOS
observation (25 km) grids. Three widely-used methods for
removing bias between model simulations and satellite
observations of soil moisture are evaluated. These methods
match the first, second and higher order moments of the soil
moisture distributions, respectively. In this study, the
first order bias correction, i.e. the rescaling of the long
term mean, is the recommended method. Preserving the
observational variability of the SMOS soil moisture data
leads to improved soil moisture updates, particularly for
dry and wet conditions, and enhances initial conditions for
runoff generation. Second or higher order bias correction,
which includes a rescaling of the variance, decreases the
temporal variability of the assimilation results. In
comparison with in situ measurements of OzNet, the
assimilation with mean bias correction reduces the root mean
square error (RMSE) of the modeled soil moisture from 0.058
m3/m3 to 0.046 m3/m3 and increases the correlation from
0.564 to 0.714. These improvements in antecedent wetness
conditions further translate into improved predictions of
associated water fluxes, particularly runoff peaks. In
conclusion, the results of this study clearly demonstrate
the merit of SMOS data assimilation for soil moisture and
streamflow predictions at the large scale.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {050},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000361405500013},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.025},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281469},
}