000281916 001__ 281916
000281916 005__ 20210129222110.0
000281916 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.054
000281916 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1053-8119
000281916 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1095-9572
000281916 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000372745300013
000281916 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:5056714
000281916 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:26827815
000281916 037__ $$aFZJ-2016-01572
000281916 082__ $$a610
000281916 1001_ $$00000-0002-6351-8849$$aVossel, Simone$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000281916 245__ $$aIndividual attentional selection capacities are reflected in interhemispheric connectivity of the parietal cortex
000281916 260__ $$aOrlando, Fla.$$bAcademic Press$$c2016
000281916 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1455009606_7292
000281916 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000281916 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000281916 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000281916 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000281916 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000281916 520__ $$aModelling psychophysical data using the Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) allows for a quantification of attentional sub-processes, such as the resolution of competition amongst multiple stimuli by top-down control signals for target selection (TVA-parameter α). This fMRI study investigated the neural correlates of α by comparing activity differences and changes of effective connectivity between conditions where a target was accompanied by a distractor or by a second target. Twenty-five participants performed a partial report task inside the MRI scanner. The left angular gyrus (ANG), medial frontal, and posterior cingulate cortex showed higher activity when a target was accompanied by a distractor as opposed to a second target. The reverse contrast yielded activation of a bilateral fronto-parietal network, the anterior insula, anterior cingulate cortex, and left inferior occipital gyrus. A psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed that the connectivity between left ANG and the left and right supramarginal gyrus (SMG), left anterior insula, and right putamen was enhanced in the target-distractor condition in participants with worse attentional top-down control. Dynamic causal modelling suggested that the connection from left ANG to right SMG during distractor presence was modulated by α. Our data show that interindividual differences in attentional processing are reflected in changes of effective connectivity without significant differences in activation strength of network nodes.
000281916 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000281916 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-111$$a111 - Efficient and Flexible Power Plants (POF3-111)$$cPOF3-111$$fPOF III$$x1
000281916 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000281916 7001_ $$00000-0002-4502-0166$$aWeidner, Ralph$$b1
000281916 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMoos, Katharina$$b2
000281916 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b3$$ufzj
000281916 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8$$a10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.054$$gVol. 129, p. 148 - 158$$p148 - 158$$tNeuroImage$$v129$$x1053-8119$$y2016
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.pdf$$yRestricted
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yRestricted
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.jpg?subformat=icon-1440$$xicon-1440$$yRestricted
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yRestricted
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.jpg?subformat=icon-640$$xicon-640$$yRestricted
000281916 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/281916/files/1-s2.0-S1053811916000690-main.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yRestricted
000281916 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:281916$$pVDB
000281916 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000281916 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000281916 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lEnergieeffizienz, Materialien und Ressourcen$$vEfficient and Flexible Power Plants$$x1
000281916 9141_ $$y2016
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2014
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0550$$2StatID$$aNo Authors Fulltext
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROIMAGE : 2014
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000281916 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000281916 920__ $$lyes
000281916 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000281916 980__ $$ajournal
000281916 980__ $$aVDB
000281916 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000281916 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406