Hauptseite > Workflowsammlungen > Öffentliche Einträge > Energizing marginal soils – The establishment of the energy crop Sida hermaphrodita as dependent on digestate fertilization, NPK, and legume intercropping > print

001     282984
005     20220930130057.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.010
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0961-9534
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1873-2909
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/9907
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000374235500002
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2016-01711
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 630
100 1 _ |a Nabel, Moritz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161129
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Energizing marginal soils – The establishment of the energy crop Sida hermaphrodita as dependent on digestate fertilization, NPK, and legume intercropping
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2016
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1456816340_17454
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Growing energy crops in marginal, nutrient-deficient soils is a more sustainable alternative to conventional cultivation. The use of energy-intensive synthetic fertilizers needs to be reduced, preferably via closed nutrient loops in the biomass production cycle. In the present study based on the first growing season of a mesocosm experiment using large bins outdoors, we evaluated the potential of the energy plant Sida hermaphrodita to grow in a marginal sandy soil. We applied different fertilization treatments using either digestate from biogas production or a commercial mineral NPK-fertilizer. To further increase independence from synthetically produced N-fertilizers, the legume plant Medicago sativa was intercropped to introduce atmospherically fixed nitrogen and potentially facilitate the production of additional S. hermaphrodita biomass. We found digestate to be the best performing fertilizer because it produced similar yields as the NPK fertilization but minimized nitrate leaching. Legume intercropping increased the total biomass yield by more than 100% compared to S. hermaphrodita single cropping in the fertilized variants. However, it negatively influenced the performance of S. hermaphrodita in the following year. We conclude that a successful establishment of S. hermaphrodita for biomass production in marginal soils is possible and digestate application formed the best fertilization method when considering a range of aspects including overall yield, nitrate leaching, nitrogen fixation of M. sativa, and sustainability over time.
536 _ _ |a 582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|c POF3-582
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Temperton, Vicky
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129409
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Poorter, Hendrik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Lücke, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129567
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Jablonowski, Nicolai D.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
|b 4
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.02.010
|g Vol. 87, p. 9 - 16
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1496404-1
|p 9 - 16
|t Biomass and bioenergy
|v 87
|y 2016
|x 0961-9534
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.gif?subformat=icon
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-1440
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-180
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.jpg?subformat=icon-180
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x icon-640
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.jpg?subformat=icon-640
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/282984/files/Nabel_EtAl_2016.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:282984
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161129
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129567
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129475
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Plant Science
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2016
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BIOMASS BIOENERG : 2014
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
980 1 _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a APC

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21