000028517 001__ 28517
000028517 005__ 20240712101022.0
000028517 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2001JD001494
000028517 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000182068900001
000028517 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0141-8637
000028517 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20875
000028517 037__ $$aPreJuSER-28517
000028517 041__ $$aeng
000028517 082__ $$a550
000028517 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000028517 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEsler, J. G.$$b0
000028517 245__ $$aTransport and mixing between airmasses in cold frontal regions during Dynamics and Chemistry of Frontal Zones (DCFZ)
000028517 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$c2003
000028517 300__ $$aD4
000028517 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000028517 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000028517 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000028517 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000028517 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000028517 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000028517 440_0 $$06393$$aJournal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres$$v108$$x0148-0227
000028517 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000028517 520__ $$a[1] The passage of two cold front systems over the United Kingdom are compared and contrasted, using the results of a detailed aircraft and ground-based study. The measurements are interpreted by means of three-dimensional, reverse-domain-filling trajectories using both global models and limited-area mesoscale models. This method provides a three-dimensional picture of the interleaving air-masses in the frontal zone as defined by their Lagrangian histories. The two systems studied differ in that the first is associated with an intense surface low in January and the second is associated with a relatively weak surface low in April. In the intense surface low case the trajectory study suggests that a dry intrusion with stratospheric characteristics penetrated deep into the troposphere along the upper level front. Measurements indeed revealed an unsaturated layer with anomalously high ozone. This layer was intersected at four levels in the troposphere (at 8.5, 7.1, 5.2 and 3.7 km), and the lower the intersection, the lower the measured anomalous ozone and the higher the water vapor content. It is argued that this is best explained by the dry-intrusion layer becoming mixed with background air by three-dimensional turbulence, also encountered by the aircraft, along the upper level front. Evidence for this mixing is apparent on tracer-tracer scatterplots. In the weak surface low case, by contrast, the dry intrusion has a more complex structure, with up to three separate layers of enhanced ozone and low humidity. Strong evidence for mixing was apparent only in the lowest layer. The weaker system may therefore be much more efficient at transporting upper tropospheric/stratospheric ozone to the lower troposphere. The transport of boundary layer air to the upper troposphere in the warm conveyor belt (WCB), however, was found to be around 8 times stronger in the intense system. Sonde measurements suggested that the WCB was ventilated by convection from the surface front in some regions to about 5-6 km, while it was stably stratified in other regions, suggesting layerwise long-range transport.
000028517 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000028517 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000028517 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000028517 65320 $$2Author$$afrontal zones
000028517 65320 $$2Author$$achemistry and mixing
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHaynes, P. H.$$b1
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLaw, K. S.$$b2
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBarjat, H.$$b3
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDewey, K.$$b4
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKent, J.$$b5
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB1438$$aSchmitgen, S.$$b6$$uFZJ
000028517 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBrough, N.$$b7
000028517 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7 $$a10.1029/2001JD001494$$gVol. 108, p. D4$$pD4$$q108<D4$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres  $$tJournal of Geophysical Research$$v108$$x0148-0227$$y2003
000028517 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001494
000028517 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/28517/files/2001JD001494.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000028517 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/28517/files/2001JD001494.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000028517 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:28517$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000028517 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000028517 9141_ $$y2003
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer review
000028517 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000028517 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000028517 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)22218
000028517 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000028517 980__ $$aVDB
000028517 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000028517 980__ $$ajournal
000028517 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000028517 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000028517 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000028517 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013