% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Shetter:28661,
author = {Shetter, R. E. and Junkermann, W. and Swartz, W. H. and
Frost, G. J. and Crawford, J. H. and Lefer, B. L. and
Barrick, J. D. and Hall, S. R. and Hofzumahaus, A. and Bais,
A. F. and Calvert, J. G. and Cantrell, A. A. and Madronich,
S. and Müller, M. and Kraus, A. and Monks, P. S. and
Edwards, G. D. and McKenzie, R. and Johnston, P. and
Schmitt, R. and Griffioen, E. and Krol, M. and Kylling, A.
and Dickerson, R. R. and Lloyd, S. A. and Martin, T. J. and
Gardiner, B. and Mayer, B. and Pfister, G. and Röth, E. P.
and Koepke, P. and Ruggaber, A. and Schwander, H. and van
Weele, M.},
title = {{P}hotolysis {F}requency of {NO}2: {M}easurement and
{M}odeling during the {I}nternational {P}hotolysis
{F}requency {M}easurement and {M}odeling {I}ntercomparison
({IPMMI})},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research},
volume = {108},
issn = {0148-0227},
address = {Washington, DC},
publisher = {Union},
reportid = {PreJuSER-28661},
pages = {IPM 3-1 - IPM 3-8},
year = {2003},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {[1] The photolysis frequency of NO2, j(NO2), was determined
by various instrumental techniques and calculated using a
number of radiative transfer models for 4 days in June 1998
at the International Photolysis Frequency Measurement and
Modeling Intercomparison (IPMMI) in Boulder, Colorado.
Experimental techniques included filter radiometry,
spectroradiometry, and chemical actinometry. Eight research
groups participated using 14 different instruments to
determine j( NO2). The blind intercomparison experimental
results were submitted to the independent experimental
referee and have been compared. Also submitted to the
modeling referee were the results of NO2 photolysis
frequency calculations for the same time period made by 13
groups who used 15 different radiative transfer models.
These model results have been compared with each other and
also with the experimental results. The model calculation of
clear-sky j(NO2) values can yield accurate results, but the
accuracy depends heavily on the accuracy of the molecular
parameters used in these calculations. The instrumental
measurements of j(NO2) agree to within the uncertainty of
the individual instruments and indicate the stated
uncertainties in the instruments or the uncertainties of the
molecular parameters may be overestimated. This agreement
improves somewhat with the use of more recent NO2
cross-section data reported in the literature.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-I / ICG-II},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47 / I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48},
pnm = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
shelfmark = {Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000183555600001},
doi = {10.1029/2002JD002932},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/28661},
}