% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Krmer:29694,
      author       = {Krämer, M. and Müller, Ri. and Bovensmann, H. and
                      Burrows, J. and Brinkmann, J. and Röth, E. P. and Grooß,
                      J. U. and Müller, Rolf and Woyke, Th. and Ruhnke, R. and
                      Günther, G. and Hendricks, P. V. and Lippert, E. and
                      Carslaw, K. S. and Peter, Th. and Zieger, A. and Brühl, Ch.
                      and Steil, B. and Lehmann, R. and McKenna, D. S.},
      title        = {{I}ntercomparison of stratospheric chemistry models under
                      polar vortex conditions},
      journal      = {Journal of atmospheric chemistry},
      volume       = {45},
      issn         = {0167-7764},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-29694},
      pages        = {51 - 77},
      year         = {2003},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {Several stratospheric chemistry modules from box, 2-D or
                      3-D models, have been intercompared. The intercomparison was
                      focused on the ozone loss and associated reactive species
                      under the conditions found in the cold, wintertime Arctic
                      and Antarctic vortices. Comparisons of both gas phase and
                      heterogeneous chemistry modules show excellent agreement
                      between the models under constrained conditions for
                      photolysis and the microphysics of polar stratospheric
                      clouds. While the mean integral ozone loss ranges from
                      $4-80\%$ for different 30-50 days long air parcel
                      trajectories, the mean scatter of model results around these
                      values is only about $+/-1.5\%.$ In a case study, where the
                      models employed their standard photolysis and microphysical
                      schemes, the variation around the mean percentage ozone loss
                      increases to about $+/-7\%.$ This increased scatter of model
                      results is mainly due to the different treatment of the PSC
                      microphysics and heterogeneous chemistry in the models,
                      whereby the most unrealistic assumptions about PSC processes
                      consequently lead to the least representative ozone
                      chemistry. Furthermore, for this case study the model
                      results for the ozone mixing ratios at different altitudes
                      were compared with a measured ozone profile to investigate
                      the extent to which models reproduce the stratospheric ozone
                      losses. It was found that mainly in the height range of
                      strong ozone depletion all models underestimate the ozone
                      loss by about a factor of two. This finding corroborates
                      earlier studies and implies a general deficiency in our
                      understanding of the stratospheric ozone loss chemistry
                      rather than a specific problem related to a particular model
                      simulation.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {ICG-I},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB47},
      pnm          = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
      shelfmark    = {Environmental Sciences / Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric
                      Sciences},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000183325000004},
      doi          = {10.1023/A:1024056026432},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/29694},
}