000029886 001__ 29886
000029886 005__ 20240712101025.0
000029886 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2003GL017168
000029886 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000184577400006
000029886 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20830
000029886 037__ $$aPreJuSER-29886
000029886 041__ $$aeng
000029886 082__ $$a550
000029886 084__ $$2WoS$$aGeosciences, Multidisciplinary
000029886 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB405$$aFolkers, M.$$b0$$uFZJ
000029886 245__ $$aInfluence of an organic coating on the reactivity of aqueous aerosols probed by the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5
000029886 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bAmerican Geophysical Union$$c2003
000029886 300__ $$a12
000029886 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000029886 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000029886 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000029886 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000029886 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000029886 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000029886 440_0 $$02249$$aGeophysical Research Letters$$v30$$x0094-8276
000029886 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000029886 520__ $$a[1] Surface-active organic compounds are common constituents of atmospheric aerosol particles. In this work, the effects of organic coatings on the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5 was investigated. For this purpose aqueous NH4HSO4 particles were coated in situ in a large aerosol chamber. The experiments show that films composed of the ozonolysis products of alpha-pinene can reduce the reaction probability by more than an order of magnitude. Model calculations indicate that the main cause for the retardation of the hydrolysis is a slower uptake possibly due to a lower solubility of N2O5 in the organic film.
000029886 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000029886 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000029886 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000029886 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16346$$aMentel, T. F.$$b1$$uFZJ
000029886 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16324$$aWahner, A.$$b2$$uFZJ
000029886 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2021599-X$$a10.1029/2003GL017168$$gVol. 30, p. 12$$p12$$q30<12$$tGeophysical research letters$$v30$$x0094-8276$$y2003
000029886 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017168
000029886 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/29886/files/2003GL017168.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000029886 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/29886/files/2003GL017168.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000029886 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:29886$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000029886 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000029886 9141_ $$y2003
000029886 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000029886 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000029886 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000029886 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)27102
000029886 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000029886 980__ $$aVDB
000029886 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000029886 980__ $$ajournal
000029886 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000029886 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000029886 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000029886 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013