Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Tunable diode laser measurements of formaldehyde during the TOPSE 2000 study: Distributions, trends, and model comparisons > print

001     32542
005     20240712101047.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1029/2002JD002208
|2 DOI
024 7 _ |a WOS:000181937100004
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 0141-8637
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/20865
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-32542
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
100 1 _ |a Fried, A.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Tunable diode laser measurements of formaldehyde during the TOPSE 2000 study: Distributions, trends, and model comparisons
260 _ _ |c 2003
|a Washington, DC
|b Union
300 _ _ |a TOP 13-1 - TOP 13-2
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres
|x 0148-0227
|0 6393
|y D4
|v 108
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a [1] Airborne measurements of formaldehyde (CH2O) were acquired employing tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS) during the 2000 Tropospheric Ozone Production About the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) study. This study consisted of seven deployments spanning the time period from 4 February to 23 May 2000 and covered a wide latitudinal band from 40degreesN to 85degreesN. The median measured CH2O concentrations, with a few exceptions, did not show any clear temporal trends from February to May in each of five altitude and three latitude bins examined. Detailed measurement-model comparisons were carried out using a variety of approaches employing two different steady state models. Because recent emissions of CH2O and/or its precursors often result in model underpredictions, background conditions were identified using a number of chemical tracers. For background conditions at temperatures warmer than -45degreesC, the measurement-model agreement on average ranged between -13% and +5% (measurement-model/measurement), which corresponded to mean and median (measurement-model) differences of 3 +/- 69 and -6 parts per trillion by volume (pptv), respectively. At very low temperatures starting at around -45degreesC, significant and persistent (measurement-model) differences were observed from February to early April from southern Canada to the Arctic Ocean in the 6-8 km altitude range. In such cases, measured CH2O was as much as 392 pptv higher than modeled, and the median difference was 132 pptv (83%). Low light conditions as well as cold temperatures may be important in this effect. A number of possible mechanisms involving the reaction of CH3O2 with HO2 to produce CH2O directly were investigated, but in each case the discrepancy was only minimally reduced. Other possibilities were also considered but in each case there was no compelling evidence to support any of the hypotheses. Whatever the cause, the elevated CH2O concentrations significantly impact upper tropospheric HOx levels at high latitudes (>57degreesN) in the February-April time frame.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a airborne formaldehyde measurements
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a tunable diode laser measurements
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a formaldehyde measurements at high latitudes
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a formaldehyde during TOPSE
700 1 _ |a Wang, Y.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Cantrell, C.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Wert, B.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Walega, J.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Ridley, B.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Atlas, E.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Shetter, R.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Lefer, B.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Coffey, M. T.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Hannigan, J.
|b 10
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Blake, D.
|b 11
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Blake, N.
|b 12
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Meinardi, S.
|b 13
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Talbot, B.
|b 14
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Dibb, J.
|b 15
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Scheuer, E.
|b 16
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Wingenter, O.
|b 17
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Snow, J.
|b 18
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Heikes, B.
|b 19
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Ehhalt, D.H.
|b 20
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)3735
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7
|a 10.1029/2002JD002208
|g Vol. 108, p. TOP 13-1 - TOP 13-2
|p TOP 13-1 - TOP 13-2
|q 108|t Journal of Geophysical Research
|v 108
|x 0148-0227
|y 2003
|t Journal of geophysical research / Atmospheres
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002208
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/32542/files/2002JD002208.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/32542/files/2002JD002208.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:32542
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2003
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |k ICG-II
|l Troposphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)35329
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21