000033294 001__ 33294
000033294 005__ 20240712101001.0
000033294 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1029/2000JD000136
000033294 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000180427400006
000033294 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-1406
000033294 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0148-0227
000033294 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/20617
000033294 037__ $$aPreJuSER-33294
000033294 041__ $$aeng
000033294 082__ $$a550
000033294 082__ $$a550
000033294 084__ $$2WoS$$aMeteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
000033294 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBalis, D.$$b0
000033294 245__ $$aMeasurements and modeling of photolysis rates during the Photochemical Activity and Ultraviolet Radiation (PAUR) II campaign
000033294 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$aWashington, DC$$bUnion$$bUnion$$c2002
000033294 29510 $$a.
000033294 300__ $$aPAU 5-1 - PAU 5-12
000033294 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000033294 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000033294 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000033294 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000033294 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000033294 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000033294 440_0 $$03369$$aJournal of Geophysical Research$$v107$$x0022-1406$$yD18
000033294 500__ $$aRecord converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
000033294 520__ $$a[1] In this paper we compare radiative transfer model calculations of the actinic flux in the UV spectral region with airborne measurements of the actinic flux, obtained during the Photochemical Activity and Ultraviolet Radiation (PAUR) campaign, which took place in the Aegean Sea, Greece, in June 1996, in order to assess the accuracy of the model in calculating photolysis rates, when the model input parameters are well defined from measurements. The model can simulate the total actinic flux (4 pi sr) in the UV-A region with an accuracy of 5% for all altitudes (0.1-12 km) in the cloud free troposphere, while in the UV-B the impact of the vertical distribution of ozone and aerosol can lead to differences, of about 5-10% at low altitudes up to 20% at higher altitudes. Next, the photolysis rates of J((OD)-D-1) and J(NO2) measured during the PAUR 2, in Crete, Greece (35.5degreesN, 23.8degreesE), in May 1999, at two altitudes (Gerani 30 m and Prases 1000 m), are compared with the respective model calculations in order to examine the effect of the alternating Sahara dust/maritime aerosol environments imposed to these photolysis rates, as well as to examine their differences due to the altitude difference. It is shown that high levels of tropospheric ozone and absorbing aerosols can cause a decrease in the photolysis rates of ozone near the surface, even under conditions of reduced total ozone content. This fact indicates that tropospheric ozone can be disproportionately important as a filter against UV-B radiation when most scattering of the radiation by air molecules and dust occurs in the troposphere. This behavior is not simulated accurately using a radiative transfer model constrained by observations of ozone and aerosol optical depths. The differences of the of the photolysis rates between the two altitudes as determined by the model and by the measurements, differ significantly for the Sahara dust event, indicating that during this event in the boundary layer, there is a mixture of desert and nonabsorbing aerosols.
000033294 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$cU01$$x0
000033294 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000033294 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000033294 65320 $$2Author$$atotal ozone
000033294 65320 $$2Author$$aphotochemistry
000033294 65320 $$2Author$$aUVB radiation
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZerefos, C. S.$$b1
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKourtidis, K.$$b2
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBais, A. F.$$b3
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)16326$$aHofzumahaus, A.$$b4$$uFZJ
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB832$$aKraus, A.$$b5$$uFZJ
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchmitt, R.$$b6
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBlumthaler, M.$$b7
000033294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGobbi, G. P.$$b8
000033294 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7$$a10.1029/2000JD000136$$gVol. 107, p. PAU 5-1 - PAU 5-12$$pPAU 5-1 - PAU 5-12$$q107<PAU 5-1 - PAU 5-12$$tJournal of geophysical research / Atmospheres$$v107$$x0022-1406$$y2002
000033294 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000136
000033294 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/33294/files/2000JD000136.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000033294 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/33294/files/2000JD000136.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000033294 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:33294$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000033294 9131_ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257$$bEnvironment (Umwelt)$$kU01$$lChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$vChemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre$$x0
000033294 9141_ $$y2002
000033294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000033294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000033294 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48$$d31.12.2006$$gICG$$kICG-II$$lTroposphäre$$x0
000033294 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)3775
000033294 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000033294 980__ $$aVDB
000033294 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000033294 980__ $$ajournal
000033294 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
000033294 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000033294 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
000033294 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013