001     33352
005     20240709081616.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1023/A:1015732532499
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000175947400014
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-33352
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 540
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Environmental Sciences
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
100 1 _ |a Corsmeier, U.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Ozone and PAN formation inside and outside of the Berlin plume - process analysis and numerical process simulation
260 _ _ |a Dordrecht [u.a.]
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V
|c 2002
300 _ _ |a 289 - 321
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry
|x 0167-7764
|0 3073
|v 42
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a During the BERLIOZ field phase on 20 July 1998 a 40 km wide ozone-plume 30 to 70 km north of Berlin in the lee of the city was detected. The ozone mixing ratio inside the plume was app. 15 ppb higher than outside, mainly caused by high ozone precursor emissions in Berlin, resulting in a net chemical ozone production of 6.5 ppb h(-1), which overcompensates ozone advection of -3.6 ppb h(-1) and turbulent diffusion of -1.1 ppb h(-1). That means, although more ozone leaves the control volume far in the lee of Berlin than enters it at the leeside cityborder and although turbulent diffusion causes a loss of ozone in the leeside control volume the chemical production inside the volume leads to a net ozone increase. Using a semi-Lagrangian mass budget method to estimate the net ozone production, 5.0 ppb h(-1) are calculated for the plume. This means a fraction of about 20% of ozone in the plume is produced by local emissions, therefore called 'home made' by the Berlin emissions. For the same area KAMM/DRAIS simulations using an observation based initialisation, results in a net production rate between 4.0 and 6.5 ppb h(-1), while the threefold nested EURAD model gives 6.0 ppb h(-1). The process analysis indicates in many cases good agreement (10% or better) between measurements and simulations not only in the ozone concentrations but also with respect to the physical and chemical processes governing the total change. Remaining differences are caused by different resolution in time and space of the models and measurements as well as by errors in the emission calculation.The upwind-downwind differences in PAN concentrations are partly similar to those of ozone, because in the BERLIOZ case they are governed mainly by photochemical production. While in the stable boundary layer at night and windward of Berlin 0.1 to 0.3 ppb are detected, in the centre of the plume at noon concentrations between 0.75 ppb and 1.0 ppb are measured. The O-3/PAN ratio is about 80 to 120 and thus due to the relatively low PAN concentrations significantly higher than found in previous studies. The low PAN formation on 20 July, was mainly restricted by the moderate nonmethane hydrocarbon levels, whereas high PAN concentrations of 3.0 ppb on 21 July, are caused by local production in the boundary layer and by large scale advection aloft.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a city plume
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ozone formation
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a PAN formation
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a airborne measurements
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a process studies
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a numerical simulations
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a anthropogenic precursor
700 1 _ |a Kalthoff, N.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Vogel, B.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Hammer, M.-U.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Fiedler, A. R.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Kottmeier, C.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Volz-Thomas, A.
|b 6
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)6742
700 1 _ |a Konrad, S.
|b 7
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB808
700 1 _ |a Glaser, K.
|b 8
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB4331
700 1 _ |a Neininger, B.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Lehning, M.
|b 10
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Jaeschke, W.
|b 11
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Memmesheimer, M.
|b 12
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Rappenglück, B.
|b 13
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Jakobi, G.
|b 14
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1023/A:1015732532499
|g Vol. 42, p. 289 - 321
|p 289 - 321
|q 42<289 - 321
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1475524-5
|t Journal of atmospheric chemistry
|v 42
|y 2002
|x 0167-7764
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:33352
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2002
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-II
|l Troposphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)3833
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21