% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{VolzThomas:34307,
author = {Volz-Thomas, A. and Slemr, J. and Konrad, S. and Schmitz,
T. and Apel, E. C. and Mohnen, V. A.},
title = {{Q}uality assurance of hydrocarbon measurements in the
{G}erman {T}ropospheric {R}esearch {F}ocus ({TFS})},
journal = {Journal of atmospheric chemistry},
volume = {42},
issn = {0167-7764},
address = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
publisher = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
reportid = {PreJuSER-34307},
pages = {255 - 279},
year = {2002},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {In the German Focus on Tropospheric Research (TFS)
independent quality assurance procedures were implemented in
order to obtain information on data quality and
comparability of the different measurements made in the
different field campaigns. This paper describes the results
for measurements of hydrocarbons using in-situ gas
chromatographic techniques and off line analysis of samples
collected in canisters (analysed by two central laboratories
CL-1 and CL-2) and samples collected on adsorption tubes.
The QA-procedures included comparisons with synthetic
standards (prepared by EN 45001 certified laboratories),
absolute calibration with a diffusion source, and an
instrument/methodology comparison in ambient air.
Harmonisation of the ambient measurements was achieved with
a complex mixture (NCAR/BERLIOZ) containing 70 commonly
observed hydrocarbons at mixing ratios of 0.2 to 10 ppb
(mole fraction) in nitrogen, which was calibrated by
referencing to hydrocarbon standards of the National
Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST).For the
certified synthetic standards, the experienced groups agreed
to within $+/-20\%$ for most compounds. Much larger
discrepancies were observed for the new Airmotec HC2010
instruments due to problems with identification, co-elution
and blanks/memory effects. The results in ambient air were
similar: Reasonable agreement was found for the results from
the experienced groups with well characterised in situ
instruments and for the charcoal tubes, whereas larger
discrepancies were observed for the results from new groups
and instruments. For the latter, only selected compounds met
the data quality objectives (DQO). The canister samples
analysed by CL-2 were in good agreement with the reference
instrument, whereas large deviations were found for a number
of compounds in the analysis of the same canisters by CL-1.
The results of the comparison provided the final basis for
flagging and harmonising the data from all participants
prior to their submission to the TFS central data bank.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-II},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48},
pnm = {Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Meteorology $\&$ Atmospheric
Sciences},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000175947400012},
doi = {10.1023/A:1015793319095},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/34307},
}