001     34363
005     20240712101038.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1029/2002JD002797
|2 DOI
024 7 _ |a WOS:000184868600001
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a 0141-8637
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/20582
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-34363
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 550
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
100 1 _ |a Vautard, R.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Paris emission inventory diagnostics from ESQUIF airborne measurements and a chemistry transport model
260 _ _ |c 2003
|a Washington, DC
|b Union
300 _ _ |a 17
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Journal of Geophysical Research D: Atmospheres
|x 0148-0227
|0 6393
|v 108
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a During the Atmospheric Pollution Over the Paris Area (ESQUIF) experiment a series of airborne measurements were collected in the vicinity of the city of Paris during smog episodes. They are used in combination with an air quality photochemical model in order to diagnose uncertainties in the current emission inventory. Diagnostics are made by comparing simulated with observed concentrations for nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and primary hydrocarbons, taking into account the chemistry and transport processes of these compounds. An emphasis is put on the uncertainty of the results, taking into account the finiteness of the measurement samples, possible errors in the model transport, and chemistry and measurement errors. We examine, in particular, possible sources of bias in the model. For instance, we show that boundary layer depth is underestimated by at most 30% on average. However, sensitivity experiments showed that these model biases, taken individually, cannot alter the qualitative aspects of our results. Only a conspiracy of these biases could possibly shift all our diagnostics toward significantly different results. There is reasonable consistency between simulated and measured concentrations. NOy simulations agree with measured concentrations to within 35%; CO concentrations agree to within a factor of 2. There are significant underestimations and overestimations in some individual primary hydrocarbons. However, the total mass and reactivity of the measured hydrocarbon mixture, which accounts for only about half of the total emitted mass, agree with modeled values to within an estimated uncertainty of 40%. The analysis of results provides clues for improving emission inventories. It is found, for instance, that temperature dependence, which is not considered here, can be a key factor and that hydrocarbon emissions from solvent use may suffer from inaccurate totals or speciation. Another source of uncertainties may be the temporal or spatial distributions of solvent activities.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a emissions
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a airborne measurements
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a photochemistry
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a NMVOC melting
700 1 _ |a Martin, D.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Beekmann, M.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Dobronski, P.
|b 3
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Friedrich, R.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Jaubertie, A.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Kley, D.
|b 6
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)16204
700 1 _ |a Lattuati, M.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Moral, P.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Neininger, B.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Theloke, J.
|b 10
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2016800-7
|a 10.1029/2002JD002797
|g Vol. 108, p. 17
|p 17
|q 108<17
|t Journal of Geophysical Research
|v 108
|x 0148-0227
|y 2003
|t Journal of geophysical research / Atmospheres
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002797
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/34363/files/2002JD002797.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/34363/files/2002JD002797.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:34363
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2003
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 1 _ |k ICG-II
|l Troposphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB48
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)4259
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21