% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@PHDTHESIS{Voigt:34787,
author = {Voigt, Jörg},
title = {{M}agnetische {S}trukturen in
$[{E}r\Tb]-{S}chichtsystemen:$ {E}influß der magnetischen
{N}achbarschaft und konkurrierender {A}nisotropien},
volume = {4087},
issn = {0944-2952},
school = {Techn. Hochsch. Aachen},
type = {Dr. (FH)},
address = {Jülich},
publisher = {Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH Zentralbibliothek, Verlag},
reportid = {PreJuSER-34787, Juel-4087},
series = {Berichte des Forschungszentrums Jülich},
pages = {II, 144 p},
year = {2003},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012; Aachen, Techn.
Hochsch., Diss., 2003},
abstract = {The present work concerns the influence of the artificial
superstructure and competing anisotropies on the magnetic
structure in [Er$\vert$Tb] superlattices. Combining neutron
diffraction and resonance x-ray magnetic scattering (RXMS)
the long range magnetic ordering of localized 4f states can
be related to a coherent spin density wave in the conduction
bands of both Er and Tb. The direct observation of spin
density wave was made possible only by the improvements of
the RXMS technique, i.e., an excellent source at the
beamline 6id-b of the APS at the Argonne National Lab and a
very efficient polarization analysis to distinguish the
magnetic signal from the much stronger charge scattering. To
understand the magnetic behavior of a superlattice an
precise knowledge of the structural properties is needed.
Therefore the growth process for epitaxial multilayers was
optimized by in situ low energy electron diffraction and
Auger electron spectroscopy. Following recipes given in
literature for other rare earth systems, the growth
parameters have been adjusted for Er and Tb. In a
superlattice the quality of the interfaces is particularly
important. Their properties in complete multilayers have
been analysed ex situ by grazing incidence x-ray
diffraction. The interfaces extend over 3-4 atomic layers,
but the roughness is vertically correlated, as seen by the
diffuse scattering. Therefore a squared interface profile is
obtained locally even for small layer thicknesses. Wide
angle diffraction of neutrons and x-ray confirms the squared
structure of [Er$_{n_{Er}} \vert Tb_{n_{Tb}}$]
superlattices, the indices denoting the layer thickness in
atomic layers, with up to 150 repetitions of one bilayer
unit. Ferromagnetic order sets in at a temperature of 230 K,
if the Tb layer thickness is more then 20 atomic layers. The
ferromagnetic blocks are coupled, depending on temperature
and interlayer thickness. Bulk Tb undergoes a phase
transition to a helical magnetic structure at this
temperature. The suppression of the bulk helical structure
in Tb is due to epitaxial strains within the superlattice.
In contrast the [Er$_{20} \vert Tb_{5}$] sample forms a
modulated magnetic structure below 150 K. Additionally basal
plane ferromagnetic order appears below 40 K, with an
antiferromagnetic coupling of ordered layers. The RXMS
results confirm the existence of a common superlattice band
structure which is responsible for the magnetic proximity
effects. A common electronic band structure is found in an
Er$_{0,8}$Tb$_{0,2}$ film, too. The comparison with the
superlattice clarifies the difference between statistical
lattice site occupation and an artificial superstructure.
This opens the opportunity of tailored magnetic properties
by a man made structure.},
cin = {IFF-STM},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB33},
pnm = {Kondensierte Materie},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK242},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)11 / PUB:(DE-HGF)3},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/34787},
}