% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Graf:362,
author = {Graf, A. and Weihermüller, L. and Huisman, J. A. and
Herbst, M. and Bauer, J. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{M}easurement depth effects on the apparent temperature
sensitivity of soil respiration in field studies},
journal = {Biogeosciences},
volume = {5},
issn = {1726-4170},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau [u.a.]},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {PreJuSER-362},
pages = {1175 - 1188},
year = {2008},
note = {We gratefully acknowledge field assistance by Rainer Harms,
partial funding of A. Graf's postdoctoral appointment by the
"Impuls- und Vernetzungsfonds" of the Helmholtz Association,
financial support by the Helmholtz-funded FLOWatch project
and by the SFB/TR 32 "Patterns in SoilVegetation-Atmosphere
Systems: Monitoring, Modelling, and Data Assimilation"
funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), and
helpful comments by all participants of the BGD open
discussion related to this publication.},
abstract = {CO2 efflux at the soil surface is the result of respiration
in different depths that are subjected to variable
temperatures at the same time. Therefore, the temperature
measurement depth affects the apparent temperature
sensitivity of field-measured soil respiration. We summarize
existing literature evidence on the importance of this
effect, and describe a simple model to understand and
estimate the magnitude of this potential error source for
heterotrophic respiration. The model is tested against field
measurements. We discuss the influence of climate (annual
and daily temperature amplitude), soil properties (vertical
distribution of CO2 sources, thermal and gas diffusivity),
and measurement schedule (frequency, study duration, and
time averaging). Q(10) as a commonly used parameter
describing the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration
is taken as an example and computed for different
combinations of the above conditions. We define conditions
and data acquisition and analysis strategies that lead to
lower errors in field-based Q(10) determination. It was
found that commonly used temperature measurement depths are
likely to result in an underestimation of temperature
sensitivity in field experiments. Our results also apply to
activation energy as an alternative temperature sensitivity
parameter.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {ICG-4 / JARA-ENERGY},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)VDB793 / $I:(DE-82)080011_20140620$},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Ecology / Geosciences, Multidisciplinary},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000259986400016},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/362},
}