001     37047
005     20180210130106.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1071/FP04082
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000225301200005
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-37047
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 580
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |a Prichard, J.
|b 0
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
245 _ _ |a Turgor, solute import and growth in maize roots treated with galactose
260 _ _ |a Collingwood, Victoria
|b CSIRO Publ.
|c 2004
300 _ _ |a 1095 - 1103
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Functional Plant Biology
|x 1445-4408
|0 9141
|y 11
|v 31
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a It has been observed that extension growth in maize roots is almost stopped by exposure to 5 mM D-galactose in the root medium, while the import of recent photoassimilate into the entire root system is temporarily promoted by the same treatment. The aim of this study was to reconcile these two apparently incompatible observations. We examined events near the root tip before and after galactose treatment since the tip region is the site of elongation and of high carbon deposition in the root. The treatment rapidly decreased root extension along the whole growing zone. In contrast, turgor pressure, measured directly with the pressure probe in the cortical cells of the growing zone, rapidly increased by 0.15 MPa within the first hour following treatment, and the increase was maintained over the following 24 h. Both tensiometric measurements and a comparison of turgor pressure with local growth rate demonstrated that a rapid tightening of the cell wall caused the reduction in growth. Single cell sampling showed cell osmotic pressure increased by 0.3 MPa owing to accumulation of both organic and inorganic solutes. The corresponding change in cell water potential was a rise from -0.18 MPa to approximately zero. More mature cells at 14 mm from the root tip (just outside the growing region) showed a qualitatively similar response.Galactose treatment rapidly increased the import of recently fixed carbon (RFC) into the whole root as deduced by C-11 labelling of photoassimilate. In contrast, there was a significant decrease in import of recently fixed carbon into the apical 5 mm concomitant with the increase in turgor in this region. No decrease in import of recently fixed carbon was observed 5-15 mm from the root tip despite the increase in cortical cell turgor. These data are consistent with direct symplastic connections between the growing cells and the phloem supplying the solutes in the apical, but not the basal, regions of the growing zone. Hence, the inhibition of growth and the elevation of solute import induced by galactose are spatially separated within the root.
536 _ _ |a Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|c U01
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a cell solutes
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a cell wall
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a cell water relations
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a osmotic pressure
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a phloem transport
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a pressure probe
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a root growth
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a tissue mapping
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a turgor pressure
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a C-11
700 1 _ |a Tomos, A. D.
|b 1
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Farrar, J. F.
|b 2
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Minchin, P. E. H.
|b 3
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB23736
700 1 _ |a Gould, N.
|b 4
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Paul, M. J.
|b 5
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a MacRae, E. A.
|b 6
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Ferrieri, R. A.
|b 7
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Gray, D. W.
|b 8
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
700 1 _ |a Thorpe, M. R.
|b 9
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
773 _ _ |a 10.1071/FP04082
|g Vol. 31, p. 1095 - 1103
|p 1095 - 1103
|q 31<1095 - 1103
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1496158-1
|t Functional plant biology
|v 31
|y 2004
|x 1445-4408
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:37047
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k U01
|v Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|l Chemie und Dynamik der Geo-Biosphäre
|b Environment (Umwelt)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK257
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2004
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-III
|l Phytosphäre
|d 31.12.2006
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB49
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)45151
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21